Is Golang concurrency unsafe?
Golang, as a relatively young programming language, has attracted more and more attention and love with its rapid development in recent years. Golang's built-in concurrency mechanism makes it favored by many developers, but the use of the concurrency mechanism will cause some hidden dangers, especially when concurrency is unsafe, it may cause a series of problems in the program. This article will explore the reasons and solutions for unsafe concurrency in Golang.
1. Reasons why concurrency is unsafe
1. Race conditions
Race conditions refer to when multiple threads access shared resources, resulting in different results due to different operations Chaos occurs, a situation called a race condition. In Golang, race conditions are more obvious due to the asynchronous execution of coroutines.
2. Data competition
Data competition means that multiple coroutines access the same memory area at the same time, and at least one coroutine is performing a write operation. Due to Golang's concurrency mechanism, different coroutines have different execution times, so multiple coroutines may modify the same memory area at the same time.
3. Deadlock
Deadlock refers to a situation where two or more coroutines are waiting for each other to release resources and cannot continue execution. This situation may occur when using a lock. If the lock is used improperly, a deadlock will occur.
2. Example of unsafe concurrency in Golang
The following is a simple example to explain the problem of unsafe concurrency in Golang:
package main import ( "fmt" "sync" ) var num = 0 func add(wg *sync.WaitGroup) { num++ wg.Done() } func main() { var wg sync.WaitGroup for i := 0; i < 1000; i++ { wg.Add(1) go add(&wg) } wg.Wait() fmt.Println("num=", num) }
In this example, we define A global variable num, and use a coroutine to call the add method to increment num 1000 times. Due to the asynchronous execution of coroutines, the execution order of this program is uncertain. If this code runs multiple coroutines at the same time, data competition will occur, and the result of num may not be the 1000 we expect.
3. How to avoid unsafe concurrency in Golang
1. Use locks
Locks are one of the commonly used methods to solve unsafe concurrency problems. Golang provides a variety of locks Implementation, such as sync.Mutex, sync.RWMutex, etc. The use of locks can ensure that only one coroutine can access a certain resource at the same time, thereby avoiding the occurrence of data competition.
Modify the above example and use sync.Mutex to avoid data competition:
package main import ( "fmt" "sync" ) var num = 0 func add(wg *sync.WaitGroup, lock *sync.Mutex) { lock.Lock() num++ lock.Unlock() wg.Done() } func main() { var wg sync.WaitGroup var lock sync.Mutex for i := 0; i < 1000; i++ { wg.Add(1) go add(&wg, &lock) } wg.Wait() fmt.Println("num=", num) }
In this example, we use sync.Mutex to ensure that modifications to num are atomic. This avoids the occurrence of data races.
2. Use atomic operations
Golang provides a series of atomic operations to ensure that the operation of a certain resource is atomic. Use atomic operations to avoid race conditions, such as AddInt32, AddInt64, SwapInt32, SwapInt64, etc. in the sync/atomic package.
Modify the above example and use atomic operations to avoid data competition:
package main import ( "fmt" "sync/atomic" "sync" ) var num int32 func add(wg *sync.WaitGroup) { atomic.AddInt32(&num,1) wg.Done() } func main() { var wg sync.WaitGroup for i := 0; i < 1000; i++ { wg.Add(1) go add(&wg) } wg.Wait() fmt.Println("num=", num) }
In this example, we use the AddInt32 function in the sync/atomic package to ensure that the modification to num is atomic. , avoiding the occurrence of race conditions.
3. Use channels
Channels are a very commonly used synchronization mechanism in Golang concurrent programming. Channels can ensure that communication between coroutines is synchronized, thereby avoiding race conditions and data Competition issues.
Modify the above example and use channels to avoid data races:
package main import ( "fmt" "sync" ) func add(wg *sync.WaitGroup, ch chan int) { ch <- 1 wg.Done() } func main() { var wg sync.WaitGroup ch := make(chan int, 1000) for i := 0; i < 1000; i++ { wg.Add(1) go add(&wg, ch) } wg.Wait() close(ch) num := 0 for n := range ch { num += n } fmt.Println("num=", num) }
In this example, we use channels to ensure that modifications to num are synchronized, thereby avoiding the occurrence of data races. .
4. Summary
Golang’s concurrency mechanism is one of its very attractive features, but the use of the concurrency mechanism also brings certain security issues. This article discusses the reasons and solutions for Golang's unsafe concurrency, and provides solutions mainly from the aspects of avoiding data competition, race conditions and deadlocks in concurrency. In the actual programming process, we can choose the appropriate mechanism according to specific needs to ensure the quality and safety of the program.
The above is the detailed content of Is Golang concurrency unsafe?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

OpenSSL, as an open source library widely used in secure communications, provides encryption algorithms, keys and certificate management functions. However, there are some known security vulnerabilities in its historical version, some of which are extremely harmful. This article will focus on common vulnerabilities and response measures for OpenSSL in Debian systems. DebianOpenSSL known vulnerabilities: OpenSSL has experienced several serious vulnerabilities, such as: Heart Bleeding Vulnerability (CVE-2014-0160): This vulnerability affects OpenSSL 1.0.1 to 1.0.1f and 1.0.2 to 1.0.2 beta versions. An attacker can use this vulnerability to unauthorized read sensitive information on the server, including encryption keys, etc.

Backend learning path: The exploration journey from front-end to back-end As a back-end beginner who transforms from front-end development, you already have the foundation of nodejs,...

The library used for floating-point number operation in Go language introduces how to ensure the accuracy is...

Queue threading problem in Go crawler Colly explores the problem of using the Colly crawler library in Go language, developers often encounter problems with threads and request queues. �...

The difference between string printing in Go language: The difference in the effect of using Println and string() functions is in Go...

Under the BeegoORM framework, how to specify the database associated with the model? Many Beego projects require multiple databases to be operated simultaneously. When using Beego...

The problem of using RedisStream to implement message queues in Go language is using Go language and Redis...

What should I do if the custom structure labels in GoLand are not displayed? When using GoLand for Go language development, many developers will encounter custom structure tags...
