Is native PHP faster or a framework?
php is natively fast, but the framework is relatively slow.
Natively interprets PHP program execution directly, while the framework needs to load a lot of components before executing it.
It’s just that the PHP framework has well standardized the PHP code in terms of program structure and file directory, making the PHP program more organized and clearer in structure, and the PHP framework itself has written many commonly used classes and methods, which can greatly save developers time.
When dealing with some simple business logic, due to the process flow of the framework program, it will be more complex than the native PHP program, so it will have an impact on efficiency, but the impact will be very small.
Benefits of frameworks over native ones:
1. Using frameworks can greatly improve development efficiency
2. Significantly save maintenance costs
3. Easier project handover
Therefore, it is better to choose a framework than lose efficiency. Regarding efficiency, you can consider upgrading the server and other means to improve it.
For more PHP related knowledge, please visit PHP Chinese website!
The above is the detailed content of Is native PHP faster or a framework?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Performance comparison of different Java frameworks: REST API request processing: Vert.x is the best, with a request rate of 2 times SpringBoot and 3 times Dropwizard. Database query: SpringBoot's HibernateORM is better than Vert.x and Dropwizard's ORM. Caching operations: Vert.x's Hazelcast client is superior to SpringBoot and Dropwizard's caching mechanisms. Suitable framework: Choose according to application requirements. Vert.x is suitable for high-performance web services, SpringBoot is suitable for data-intensive applications, and Dropwizard is suitable for microservice architecture.

Evaluating the cost/performance of commercial support for a Java framework involves the following steps: Determine the required level of assurance and service level agreement (SLA) guarantees. The experience and expertise of the research support team. Consider additional services such as upgrades, troubleshooting, and performance optimization. Weigh business support costs against risk mitigation and increased efficiency.

Effective techniques for optimizing C++ multi-threaded performance include limiting the number of threads to avoid resource contention. Use lightweight mutex locks to reduce contention. Optimize the scope of the lock and minimize the waiting time. Use lock-free data structures to improve concurrency. Avoid busy waiting and notify threads of resource availability through events.

The learning curve of a PHP framework depends on language proficiency, framework complexity, documentation quality, and community support. The learning curve of PHP frameworks is higher when compared to Python frameworks and lower when compared to Ruby frameworks. Compared to Java frameworks, PHP frameworks have a moderate learning curve but a shorter time to get started.

The lightweight PHP framework improves application performance through small size and low resource consumption. Its features include: small size, fast startup, low memory usage, improved response speed and throughput, and reduced resource consumption. Practical case: SlimFramework creates REST API, only 500KB, high responsiveness and high throughput

Choose the best Go framework based on application scenarios: consider application type, language features, performance requirements, and ecosystem. Common Go frameworks: Gin (Web application), Echo (Web service), Fiber (high throughput), gorm (ORM), fasthttp (speed). Practical case: building REST API (Fiber) and interacting with the database (gorm). Choose a framework: choose fasthttp for key performance, Gin/Echo for flexible web applications, and gorm for database interaction.

Java framework learning roadmap for different fields: Web development: SpringBoot and PlayFramework. Persistence layer: Hibernate and JPA. Server-side reactive programming: ReactorCore and SpringWebFlux. Real-time computing: ApacheStorm and ApacheSpark. Cloud Computing: AWS SDK for Java and Google Cloud Java.

There are five misunderstandings in Go framework learning: over-reliance on the framework and limited flexibility. If you don’t follow the framework conventions, the code will be difficult to maintain. Using outdated libraries can cause security and compatibility issues. Excessive use of packages obfuscates code structure. Ignoring error handling leads to unexpected behavior and crashes.
