


Can JWT implement dynamic permission changes? What is the difference from the Session mechanism?
JWT and Session: In-depth understanding and its application in dynamic permission control
JWT (JSON Web Token) and Session mechanisms are two commonly used authentication and authorization solutions. Beginners are often confused about their characteristics and applicable scenarios, especially in terms of dynamic permission changes (such as "kicking people" operations). This article will elaborate on this.
Some people believe that JWT is a way to persist user information to the browser, and the server needs to trust JWT information. This raises a key question: Can JWT implement dynamic permission changes? If not, does the server need to fall back to the Session mechanism?
The advantage of JWT is its efficiency: after receiving the request, the server directly extracts user information from the JWT without additional database queries. However, in dynamic permission change scenarios, this advantage no longer exists. The server still needs to query the database to verify the user's real-time permissions, and the information stored in the JWT may have expired. Instead of storing redundant user information in JWT, it is better to use only a small token as the identifier for the database query, which is more efficient.
Therefore, JWT is more suitable for inter-service communication. For example, after the gateway service verifies the user's identity, it generates a JWT and adds it to subsequent requests. The subsequent service directly uses JWT information, without having to access the user service again, and each request uses an independent JWT, avoiding the complexity of permission changes.
The Session mechanism can be understood as a key-value pair mapping: the client requests to carry a key (such as Session ID), and the server uses this key to find the corresponding Session information. Cookies are usually used to store Session IDs. In non-browser environments (such as Apps), tokens also play a role similar to Session ID. JWT actually converts "find Session" to "parse Session", which is essentially not separated from the core idea of the Session mechanism.
The above is the detailed content of Can JWT implement dynamic permission changes? What is the difference from the Session mechanism?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

When developing websites using CraftCMS, you often encounter resource file caching problems, especially when you frequently update CSS and JavaScript files, old versions of files may still be cached by the browser, causing users to not see the latest changes in time. This problem not only affects the user experience, but also increases the difficulty of development and debugging. Recently, I encountered similar troubles in my project, and after some exploration, I found the plugin wiejeben/craft-laravel-mix, which perfectly solved my caching problem.

Laravel and ThinkPHP are both popular PHP frameworks and have their own advantages and disadvantages in development. This article will compare the two in depth, highlighting their architecture, features, and performance differences to help developers make informed choices based on their specific project needs.

In the process of developing a website, improving page loading has always been one of my top priorities. Once, I tried using the Miniify library to compress and merge CSS and JavaScript files in order to improve the performance of the website. However, I encountered many problems and challenges during use, which eventually made me realize that Miniify may no longer be the best choice. Below I will share my experience and how to install and use Minify through Composer.

I encountered a tricky problem when developing a multi-device-compatible website: how to accurately identify the user's browser and device information. After trying multiple methods, I found that directly parsing user-agent strings (User-Agent) are both complex and unreliable, and often misjudgments occur. Fortunately, I successfully solved this problem by installing the WhichBrowser/Parser library using Composer.

The browser's unresponsive method after the WebSocket server returns 401. When using Netty to develop a WebSocket server, you often encounter the need to verify the token. �...

Discussing the hierarchical architecture in back-end development. In back-end development, hierarchical architecture is a common design pattern, usually including controller, service and dao three layers...

Generating a WeChat applet QR code with parameters in Java and displaying it on an HTML page is a common requirement. This article will discuss in detail how to use J...

Installation and upgrade are often a challenge when managing TYPO3CMS projects. Especially when you need to handle system maintenance and setup tasks, you may encounter various problems, such as dependency conflicts, version incompatibility, etc. Fortunately, with Composer, we can easily solve these problems and improve management efficiency.
