Zap logger adds UUID to all logs in golang
php editor Xigua introduced: In golang, logging is an integral part of the development process. Zap logger is a very popular logging library that provides rich functions and high performance. Recently, a new feature has been added to Zap logger, which is to add UUID to all logs. The purpose of this function is to better track logs and facilitate developers to track problems in distributed systems. With this new feature, developers can more accurately locate problems and improve debugging efficiency. This is a very practical feature for engineers who develop using golang.
Question content
I used this method in lambda:
import ( "os" "go.uber.org/zap" "go.uber.org/zap/zapcore" ) func initlogger() *zap.logger { config := zap.newproductionencoderconfig() config.encodetime = zapcore.rfc3339timeencoder consoleencoder := zapcore.newjsonencoder(config) core := zapcore.newtee(zapcore.newcore(consoleencoder, zapcore.addsync(os.stdout), zapcore.infolevel)) return zap.new(core).with() }
In my lambda handler I have:
var ( log *zap.Logger ) func init() { log = u.InitLogger() } func handler(r events.APIGatewayProxyRequest) (*events.APIGatewayProxyResponse, error) { out, err := exec.Command("uuidgen").Output() uuid := strings.ReplaceAll(string(out), "\n", "") if err != nil { log.Error(err.Error()) } log.Info("PRINT_1", zap.Any("uuid", uuid), zap.Any("Request", r.Body)) }
I have a question, is it possible to add uuid to all logs without adding them one by one? Because in every log where I need to print something, I need to add zap.any("uuid", uuid)
The problem is that I need to pass the uuid as parameter to all methods to print it in log message or error.
Workaround
You will have to rearrange your code a bit since you are just creating the uuid in the handler which means it is request specific while the logger is global of...
However, the point for this library is that you have to create a sublogger (in fact, you're already doing this: you just pass the fields there). Any subsequent logs written to the sublogger will contain these fields.
For example:
func main() { logger := initlogger(zap.string("foo", "bar")) logger.info("first message with our `foo` key") logger.info("second message with our `foo` key") } func initlogger(fields ...zap.field) *zap.logger { config := zap.newproductionencoderconfig() config.encodetime = zapcore.rfc3339timeencoder consoleencoder := zapcore.newjsonencoder(config) core := zapcore.newtee(zapcore.newcore(consoleencoder, zapcore.addsync(os.stdout), zapcore.infolevel)) return zap.new(core).with(fields...) }
Output:
{"level":"info","ts":"2022-11-24T18:30:45+01:00","msg":"First message with our `foo` key","foo":"bar"} {"level":"info","ts":"2022-11-24T18:30:45+01:00","msg":"Second message with our `foo` key","foo":"bar"}
The above is the detailed content of Zap logger adds UUID to all logs in golang. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goisidealforbeginnersandsuitableforcloudandnetworkservicesduetoitssimplicity,efficiency,andconcurrencyfeatures.1)InstallGofromtheofficialwebsiteandverifywith'goversion'.2)Createandrunyourfirstprogramwith'gorunhello.go'.3)Exploreconcurrencyusinggorout

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.
