Backend Development
Golang
The screenshot generated by FullScreenshot() from the chromedp package is too blurry, how can I improve it?
The screenshot generated by FullScreenshot() from the chromedp package is too blurry, how can I improve it?
php editor Yuzi has a question about the chromedp package that needs to be answered. The question is about the screenshot generated using FullScreenshot() being too blurry and an improved approach is needed. When using the chromedp package, the quality of the generated screenshots may not be as expected, which may be due to some incorrect configuration or parameter settings. Here are some possible improvements to help you get clearer screenshots.
Question content
As the title says, here is the result and my code. BTW, I'm using a very low-end machine.
func main() {
chromectx, _ := chromedp.newcontext(context.background())
emulation.setdevicemetricsoverride(1920, 1080, 1.0, false).do(chromectx)
var width, height int64
var b []byte
err := chromedp.run(chromectx,
chromedp.emulateviewport(10, 10),
chromedp.navigate(`the content of the file is in the code block below.html`),
chromedp.evaluateasdevtools(`document.documentelement.scrollwidth`, &width),
chromedp.emulateviewport(width, 10),
chromedp.evaluateasdevtools(`document.documentelement.scrollheight`, &height),
chromedp.emulateviewport(width, height),
chromedp.fullscreenshot(&b, 100),
)
if err != nil {
log.fatal(err)
}
err = ioutil.writefile("test.png", b, 0777)
if err != nil {
log.fatal(err)
}
}
<!DOCTYPE html>
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
</head>
<body>
<div id="main">
# 123
123
$\sin(x)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^n}{(2n+1)!}x^{2n+1} \sin(x)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^n}{(2n+1)!}x^{2n+1} \sin(x)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^n}{(2n+1)!}x^{2n+1} \sin(x)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^n}{(2n+1)!}x^{2n+1}$
</div>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/[email protected]/dist/markdown-it-latex2img.min.js"
crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/[email protected]/dist/markdown-it.min.js"
crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<script>
var main = document.getElementById("main");
var md = window.markdownit({ html: true });
md.use(window.markdownitLatex2img, { style: "filter: opacity(75%);transform:scale(0.75);text-align:center" });
var result = md.render(main.innerHTML);
main.innerHTML = result;
</script>
</body>
I thought maybe there was a dpi setting? Or is it because my machine is too weak? Unfortunately, I don't have any more resources to explore the truth. So please help me, how can I make the screenshot clearer?
Solution
It has nothing to do with the configuration of your machine. Increasing devicescalefactor will make the image look better. See demo below:
package main
import (
"context"
"log"
"os"
"github.com/chromedp/cdproto/emulation"
"github.com/chromedp/chromedp"
)
func main() {
ctx, cancel := chromedp.newcontext(context.background(), chromedp.withdebugf(log.printf))
defer cancel()
var width, height int64
var b []byte
err := chromedp.run(ctx,
chromedp.emulateviewport(10, 10),
chromedp.navigate(`the content of the file is in the code block below.html`),
chromedp.evaluateasdevtools(`document.documentelement.scrollwidth`, &width),
chromedp.actionfunc(func(ctx context.context) error {
return chromedp.emulateviewport(width, 10).do(ctx)
}),
chromedp.evaluateasdevtools(`document.documentelement.scrollheight`, &height),
chromedp.actionfunc(func(ctx context.context) error {
return chromedp.emulateviewport(width, height, func(sdmop *emulation.setdevicemetricsoverrideparams, steep *emulation.settouchemulationenabledparams) {
sdmop.devicescalefactor = 3
}).do(ctx)
}),
chromedp.fullscreenshot(&b, 100),
)
if err != nil {
log.fatal(err)
}
err = os.writefile("test.png", b, 0o777)
if err != nil {
log.fatal(err)
}
}
A larger devicescalefactor will produce a larger image:
$ file *.png 7e9rfcQO.png: PNG image data, 797 x 144, 8-bit/color RGBA, non-interlaced test.png: PNG image data, 2391 x 432, 8-bit/color RGBA, non-interlaced
Other notes:
- In your code,
emulation.setdevicemetricsoverride(1920, 1080, 1.0, false).do(chromectx)returns achromedp.errinvalidcontexterror. It can be removed completely. - In your code, all calls to
chromedp.emulateviewportare passed with the parameterswidth: 0andheight: 0. This should be wrapped inchromedp.actionfuncto get the updatedwidthandheight.
The above is the detailed content of The screenshot generated by FullScreenshot() from the chromedp package is too blurry, how can I improve it?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!
Hot AI Tools
Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos
AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.
Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free
Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover
Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!
Hot Article
Hot Tools
Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor
SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use
Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment
Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools
SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)
Hot Topics
1666
14
1425
52
1328
25
1273
29
1253
24
Golang vs. Python: Performance and Scalability
Apr 19, 2025 am 12:18 AM
Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.
Golang and C : Concurrency vs. Raw Speed
Apr 21, 2025 am 12:16 AM
Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.
Getting Started with Go: A Beginner's Guide
Apr 26, 2025 am 12:21 AM
Goisidealforbeginnersandsuitableforcloudandnetworkservicesduetoitssimplicity,efficiency,andconcurrencyfeatures.1)InstallGofromtheofficialwebsiteandverifywith'goversion'.2)Createandrunyourfirstprogramwith'gorunhello.go'.3)Exploreconcurrencyusinggorout
Golang vs. C : Performance and Speed Comparison
Apr 21, 2025 am 12:13 AM
Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.
Golang's Impact: Speed, Efficiency, and Simplicity
Apr 14, 2025 am 12:11 AM
Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:
C and Golang: When Performance is Crucial
Apr 13, 2025 am 12:11 AM
C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.
Golang vs. Python: Key Differences and Similarities
Apr 17, 2025 am 12:15 AM
Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.
Golang and C : The Trade-offs in Performance
Apr 17, 2025 am 12:18 AM
The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.
