Porting AES encryption functionality to node.js
Question content
I am trying to port a go program (https://github.com/mckael/samtv) to node.js, which can be passed "smartview" api controls Samsung TV
There is an "aes encryption" feature in the program that I'm having trouble porting to node.
func (s *smartviewsession) aesencrypt(plaindata []byte) ([]byte, error) { //logrus.debugf("aesencrypt(%#v) : '%s'", plaindata, string(plaindata)) //logrus.debugf("session id: %d", s.sessionid) //logrus.debugf("session key: '%x'\n %v", string(s.sessionkey), s.sessionkey) // create cipher block block, err := aes.newcipher(s.sessionkey) if err != nil { return nil, err } bs := block.blocksize() //logrus.debugf("block size: %d", bs) // add padding padding := bs - len(plaindata)%bs padtext := bytes.repeat([]byte{byte(padding)}, padding) //logrus.debugf("padding: %d byte(s)", padding) plaindata = append(plaindata, padtext...) // encrypt ciphertext := make([]byte, len(plaindata)) for cipherrange := ciphertext; len(plaindata) > 0; { block.encrypt(cipherrange, plaindata[:bs]) plaindata = plaindata[bs:] cipherrange = cipherrange[bs:] } //logrus.debugf("ciphertext: %#v", ciphertext) return ciphertext, nil }
The problem I'm facing now is that I don't know what algorithmthim to use, or where I need to specify in my node.js function the "initial vector" comes from:
const SESSION_KEY = "59e8ca4b09f2a19ab5421cf55d604c7c"; var aesEncrypt = ((val, algo = "aes-256-cbc") => { let cipher = crypto.createCipheriv(algo, SESSION_KEY, IV); let encrypted = cipher.update(val, 'utf8', 'base64'); encrypted += cipher.final('base64'); return encrypted; });
Can I use crypto.createcipher(...)
instead? But it's been deprecated, and it feels like the padding stuff is important.
I know nothing about encryption. Any tips are welcome.
Note: In the go function, s.sessionkey
has the same value as session_key = "59e8ca4b09f2a19ab5421cf55d604c7c"
in node.js
Solution
go code applies aes in ecb mode and uses pkcs#7 padding. aes variants Implicit Derived from the key size, e.g. aes-128 for 16 byte keys. The ciphertext is returned as []byte
.
In the nodejs code, the aes variant and mode are explicitly specified, such as aes-128-ecb
. ecb mode does not apply IVs, so must be specified as null
in createcipheriv()
. Use padding pkcs#7 (default). The ciphertext can be returned as buffer
, which is closest to []byte
.
The published key 59e8ca4b09f2a19ab5421cf55d604c7c
looks like a hex-encoded key, it is hex-decoded 16 bytes large and therefore corresponds to aes-128. Hexadecimal decoding can be implemented in go using the encoding/hex package, for example with hex.decodestring("59e8ca4b09f2a19ab5421cf55d604c7c")
.
Nodejs code example using aes-128 (16 byte key) and pkcs#7 padding in ecb mode:
var crypto = require('crypto'); const SESSION_KEY = Buffer.from("59e8ca4b09f2a19ab5421cf55d604c7c", "hex"); var aesEncrypt = ((val, algo = "aes-128-ecb") => { let cipher = crypto.createCipheriv(algo, SESSION_KEY, null); return Buffer.concat([cipher.update(val, 'utf8'), cipher.final()]); }); var ciphertext = aesEncrypt("The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog"); console.log(ciphertext.toString('base64')); // T/uQforseVFkY93mqwpwCGVVnEFDTT5Gle8a8XUxCfOXCfYUo3uCJ/nwzCIJ9xqf
The go code gives the same results using the same key (hex decoding) and base64 encoding of plaintext and ciphertext.
For completeness: the key can also be encoded in utf-8 and then generate a 32-byte key, such as key := []byte("59e8ca4b09f2a19ab5421cf55d604c7c")
and ## in the go code #const session_key = buffer.from("59e8ca4b09f2a19ab5421cf55d604c7c", "utf-8") nodejs code. In nodejs code,
aes-256-ecb must also be applied. Ultimately, the key specification must provide information on which encoding to use.
The above is the detailed content of Porting AES encryption functionality to node.js. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.
