Golang simulation forces changes to function definitions
php editor Xiaoxin today brings you an introduction to Golang's simulation of forced change function definitions. Golang is an efficient and concise programming language with a powerful type system. However, in some cases, we may need to modify the definition of an existing function to meet specific needs. This article will introduce to you how to simulate the method of forcibly changing the function definition in Golang. Let's explore it together!
Question content
I have the following functions:
func getprice(date string) { url := (fmt.printf("http://endponint/%s", date)) resp, err := http.get(url) // unmarshall body and get price return price }
In order to unit test this function, I was forced to refactor to:
func getprice(client httpclient, date string) { url := (fmt.printf("http://endponint/%s", date)) resp, err := client.get(url) // unmarshall body and get price return price }
My test looks like this:
type MockClient struct { Response *http.Response Err error } func (m *MockClient) Get(url string) (*http.Response, error) { return m.Response, m.Err } mockResp := &http.Response{ StatusCode: http.StatusOK, Body: ioutil.NopCloser(strings.NewReader("mock response")), } client := &MockClient{ Response: mockResp, Err: nil, } data, err := getData(client, "http://example.com")
Is this the only way to test in go? Isn't there a way to mock the api that is not injected into the function?
Solution
The idiomatic way to use go for http testing is to use http/httptest (Example)
In your case, all you need to do is make the base url injectable:
var apiendpoint = "http://endpoint/" func getprice(date string) (int, error) { url := (fmt.printf("%s/%s", apiendpoint, date)) resp, err := http.get(url) // unmarshall body and get price return price, nil }
Then in each test:
srv := httptest.newserver(http.handlerfunc(func(w http.responsewriter, r *http.request) { // write the expected response to the writer })) defer srv.close() apiendpoint = srv.url price, err := getprice("1/1/2023") // handle error, check return
A better design is to wrap your api in a client struct
and make getprice
a receiver method:
type priceclient struct { endpoint string } func (pc *priceclient) getprice(date string) (int, error) { url := (fmt.printf("%s/%s", pc.endpoint, date)) resp, err := http.get(url) // unmarshall body and get price return price, nil }
srv := httptest.NewServer(http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) { // Write the expected response to the writer })) defer srv.Close() c := &PriceClient{Endpoint: srv.URL} price, err := c.GetPrice("1/1/2023") // Handle error, check return
For future reference, you should also take a look at gomock, as most other mocking problems you will encounter have no built-in solutions to the language.
The above is the detailed content of Golang simulation forces changes to function definitions. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.
