


Why doesn't net/http consider timeout durations longer than 30 seconds?
#php editor Banana discovered when discussing the timeout duration in network requests, why did net/http not consider a timeout limit exceeding 30 seconds in the design? The timeout period means that after sending a request, if no response is received within the specified time, the request will be considered failed. In network requests, the setting of the timeout is very important. If it is too short, the request may fail, and if it is too long, resources will be wasted. Through analysis, the main reason is that the balance of performance and resources, as well as the uncertainty of the network environment, were taken into consideration during the design. Next, we will answer this question in detail.
Question content
Use golang 1.20.1.
In golang's net/http and context packages, I cannot set a timeout exceeding thirty seconds. Setting a shorter timeout works well, like
Code:
log.infof("elasticsearch url is %v", elasticsearchurl) client := &http.client{timeout: time.duration(time.second * 60)} req, err := http.newrequest("get", listbackupsurl, nil) if err != nil { internalerror(w, fmt.sprintf("error creating request: %v", err)) return } req.setbasicauth(username, password) resp, err := client.do(req) if err != nil { // handle error internalerror(w, fmt.sprintf("error accessing elasticsearch: %v", err)) return }
log:
i0503 23:01:55.973821 1 somecode.go:85] url is http://elasticsearch.example.ingest:9200 e0503 23:02:25.976345 1 caller_handler.go:63] 500 internal server error: error accessing elasticsearch: get "http://elasticsearch.example.ingest:9200/_cat/snapshots/object-store-repo?v&s=id": dial tcp 1.2.3.4:9200: i/o timeout
The timeout is thirty seconds, not sixty seconds.
If I use http.newrequestwithcontext(...)
and use a context with the same timeout set, I get the same behavior:
Code:
log.infof("elasticsearch url is %v", elasticsearchurl) ctx, cancel := context.withtimeout(context.background(), time.duration(time.second * 60)) defer cancel() req, err := http.newrequestwithcontext(ctx, "get", listbackupsurl, nil) if err != nil { internalerror(w, fmt.sprintf("error creating request: %v", err)) return } req.setbasicauth(username, password) resp, err := client.do(req) if err != nil { // handle error internalerror(w, fmt.sprintf("error accessing elasticsearch: %v", err)) return }
log:
i0503 23:31:10.941169 1 somecode.go:85] elasticsearch url is http://elasticsearch.example.ingest:9200 e0503 23:31:40.941642 1 caller_handler.go:63] 500 internal server error: error accessing elasticsearch: get "http://elasticsearch.example.ingest:9200/_cat/snapshots/object-store-repo?v&s=id": dial tcp 1.2.3.4:9200: i/o timeout
However, if I change the timeout to three seconds (time.duration(time.second * 3))
in either method, it works as expected:
I0503 23:44:17.622121 1 somecode.go:85] Elasticsearch URL is http://elasticsearch.example.ingest:9200 E0503 23:44:20.624795 1 caller_handler.go:63] 500 Internal Server Error: error accessing elasticsearch: Get "http://elasticsearch.example.ingest:9200/_cat/snapshots/object-store-repo?v&s=id": context deadline exceeded (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers)
Solution
I would isolate the problem to eliminate possibilities to help narrow down what is causing the problem. If possible, use a small snippet of code so you can process only what you want.
To test your infrastructure, httpstat will help you simulate remote timeouts. Example:
func main() { client := &http.Client{Timeout: time.Duration(time.Second * 200)} req, err := http.NewRequest("GET", "https://www.php.cn/link/1a59ef90d1ea801448e1567d0896a99f/504?sleep=120000", nil) if err != nil { log.Fatal(err) return } resp, err := client.Do(req) if err != nil { log.Fatal(err) return } fmt.Println(resp) }
If you receive dial tcp ip:port: i/o timeout
timeout at this time, then you need to check your operating system and firewall. Whatever timeouts you set in go should override the OS defaults, if you're getting timeouts this way it's probably a firewall (local or remote) that's causing this.
Alternatively, es may timeout if you are able to connect externally, although according to the documentation you should expect an error message directly from es. You can set the timeout for es directly in the url and test it.
Hope this helps.
The above is the detailed content of Why doesn't net/http consider timeout durations longer than 30 seconds?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.
