


Use go-sqlmock to test gorm issues, comparing queries with mock.ExpectQuery and regexp.QuoteMeta
During the development process, it is a common requirement to use go-sqlmock to test gorm problems. go-sqlmock is a tool for simulating database operations, while gorm is a popular Go language ORM library. During the testing process, we often need to compare whether the query statement meets expectations. To do this we can use mock.ExpectQuery and regexp.QuoteMeta for comparison. This method can help us better test and debug the code and ensure the correctness and stability of the program. Next, we will introduce in detail how to use go-sqlmock for gorm testing, and show how to use mock.ExpectQuery and regexp.QuoteMeta to compare query statements.
Question content
I have a problem comparing expected query with gorm's real query, here is my code:
package repository import ( "regexp" "testing" "github.com/data-dog/go-sqlmock" "your_go_root/pkg/domain" "github.com/stretchr/testify/assert" "gorm.io/driver/mysql" "gorm.io/gorm" ) var successgettransaction domain.transaction = domain.transaction{ id: 2, buyerid: 2, sellerid: 5, itemid: 2, messageid: 2, expireddate: "2022-09-010 01:01:00", createdat: "2022-09-08 01:01:00", } func testsuccessgettransactionbyid(t *testing.t) { db, mock, err := sqlmock.new() assert.noerror(t, err) gdb, err := gorm.open(mysql.new(mysql.config{ conn: db, skipinitializewithversion: true, }), &gorm.config{}) assert.noerror(t, err) rows := sqlmock.newrows([]string{"id", "buyer_id", "seller_id", "item_id", "message_id", "expired_date", "created_at"}). addrow(2, 2, 5, 2, 2, "2022-09-010 01:01:00", "2022-09-08 01:01:00") mock.expectquery(regexp.quotemeta("select * from transaction where id = ?;")).willreturnrows(rows) repo := defaultclient(gdb) actualsectionlist, _ := repo.gettransactionbyid(2) assert.equal(t, successgettransaction, actualsectionlist, "ambas listas deberian ser iguales") assert.noerror(t, mock.expectationsweremet()) }
This is the module domain:
package domain type transaction struct { id int64 `gorm:"primarykey;column:id"` buyerid int64 `gorm:"column:buyer_id"` sellerid int64 `gorm:"column:seller_id"` itemid int `gorm:"column:item_id"` messageid int `gorm:"column:message_id"` expireddate string `gorm:"column:expired_date"` createdat string `gorm:"column:created_at"` } func (transaction) tablename() string { return "transaction" } type transactionstatus struct { id int64 `gorm:"primarykey;column:id"` transactionid int64 `gorm:"column:transaction_id"` status int `gorm:"column:status"` notificationid int `gorm:"column:notification_id"` createdat string `gorm:"column:created_at"` } func (transactionstatus) tablename() string { return "transaction_status" }
This is the function I'm testing:
package repository import ( "fmt" "your_go_root/pkg/domain" "gorm.io/gorm" ) type repositoryclient interface { gettransactionbyid(id int) (domain.transaction, error) } type repositoryclient struct { db *gorm.db } func defaultclient(db *gorm.db) repositoryclient { return &repositoryclient{ db: db, } } func (rc repositoryclient) gettransactionbyid(id int) (domain.transaction, error) { trans := domain.transaction{} status := rc.db.where("id = ?", id).find(&trans) if status.error != nil { return domain.transaction{}, status.error } if trans == (domain.transaction{}) { return domain.transaction{}, fmt.errorf("error finding transaction id %v", id) } return trans, nil }
This is the error I receive from the console:
Query: could not match actual sql: "SELECT * FROM `transaction` WHERE id = ?" with expected regexp "SELECT \* FROM transaction WHERE id = \?;"[0m[33m[0.218ms] [34;1m[rows:0][0m SELECT * FROM `transaction` WHERE id = 2
There exists an answer with "select(.*)" instead in this section, but from what I've read, that's not a real solution
Workaround
Let I try to help solve this problem. I downloaded all your files and domain.go
and repository.go
look good to me.
However, I found some small issues in the repository_test.go
file:
- The backtick is missing in the sql query you wrote
- Extra
;
at the end of the query
- Missing call to
withargs(2)
method
If you adjust these little things, you should end up with code that looks like this:
// ... omitted for brevity func TestSuccessGetTransactionByID(t *testing.T) { db, mock, err := sqlmock.New() assert.NoError(t, err) gdb, err := gorm.Open(mysql.New(mysql.Config{ Conn: db, SkipInitializeWithVersion: true, }), &gorm.Config{}) assert.NoError(t, err) rows := sqlmock.NewRows([]string{"id", "buyer_id", "seller_id", "item_id", "message_id", "expired_date", "created_at"}).AddRow(2, 2, 5, 2, 2, "2022-09-010 01:01:00", "2022-09-08 01:01:00") mock.ExpectQuery(regexp.QuoteMeta("SELECT * FROM `transaction` WHERE id = ?")).WithArgs(2).WillReturnRows(rows) repo := DefaultClient(gdb) actualSectionList, _ := repo.GetTransactionByID(2) assert.Equal(t, successGetTransaction, actualSectionList, "ambas listas deberian ser iguales") assert.NoError(t, mock.ExpectationsWereMet()) }
Then if you try to run the test it should work.
Please let me know if this solves your problem, thanks!
The above is the detailed content of Use go-sqlmock to test gorm issues, comparing queries with mock.ExpectQuery and regexp.QuoteMeta. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.
