Table of Contents
Question content
Workaround
Home Backend Development Golang Merge two mapping hierarchies from YAML files, preserving all keys

Merge two mapping hierarchies from YAML files, preserving all keys

Feb 10, 2024 pm 10:00 PM

合并来自 YAML 文件的两个映射层次结构,保留所有键

In this article, php editor Xigua will introduce how to merge two mapping hierarchies from YAML files and preserve all keys. The process is very simple and only requires the use of appropriate functions and methods. By merging two mapping hierarchies, we can combine their keys and values ​​to create a larger, more comprehensive mapping hierarchy. Whether you are working with configuration files or data processing, merging mapping hierarchies is a very useful technique. Next, we will walk you through the process step by step so that you can easily master this technique.

Question content

I am working on a solution involving nested keys in a yaml file. The software will read the files passed in the parameters and load them in the order in which keys are updated/added.

I have 2 yaml files and I want to merge them without losing any keys. I want to stack all profiles to generate a single map without removing any keys.

So I have yaml 1

env: test1
template:
  app:
    database: 
      name: oracle
Copy after login

yaml2

env: test2
template:
  app:
    database: 
      version : 12
Copy after login

The result I want is (the order is yaml1 - yaml2)

env: test2
template:
  app:
    database: 
      name: oracle
      version: 12
Copy after login

I tried copying using a map but since the keys have the same name I ended up with

env: test2
template:
    app:
        database:
            version: 12
Copy after login

I am using

gopkg.in/yaml.v3 for reading yaml provides me with the map[string] interface{}

and map using copy

package main

import (
    "fmt"
    "log"
    "maps"
    "os"
    "path/filepath"

    "gopkg.in/yaml.v3"
)

type configuration struct {
    c  m
    fl []string
}

type m = map[string]interface{}

func (c *configuration) Update(nc m) {
    if c.c == nil {
        c.c = nc
    } else {
        maps.Copy(c.c, nc)
    }
}

func (c configuration) Print() {
    d, err := yaml.Marshal(&c.c)
    if err != nil {
        log.Fatalf("error: %v", err)
    }
    fmt.Printf("---:\n%s\n\n", string(d))
}

func (c configuration) ParseDir(path string) {

}

func (c *configuration) LoadFromFile(filename string) {

    // YAML string stored in a variable
    yf, yfErr := os.ReadFile(filename)

    if yfErr != nil {
        log.Fatal("Error reading the file ", yfErr)
    }
    // Map to store the parsed YAML data
    var data m

    // Unmarshal the YAML string into the data map
    err := yaml.Unmarshal(yf, &data)
    if err != nil {
        log.Fatal(err)
    }
    c.Update(data)
}

func listFiles(path string) []string {
    var returnLf []string
    err := filepath.Walk(path,
        func(path string, info os.FileInfo, err error) error {
            if err != nil {
                return err
            }
            if info.Mode().IsRegular() {
                returnLf = append(returnLf, path)
            }
            return nil
        })
    if err != nil {
        log.Println(err)
    }
    return returnLf

}
Copy after login

Workaround

Suppose you want to merge YAML maps with "template" as the key from two YAML documents, a fairly simple implementation would look like this:

package main

import (
    "fmt"

    "gopkg.in/yaml.v3"
)

const data1 = `---
env: test1
template:
  app:
    database: 
      name: oracle
      foo: whatever
`

const data2 = `---
env: test2
template:
  app:
    some_stuff: [1, 2, 3, 4]
    database: 
      version : 12
      foo: 42
`

type T struct {
    Env  string         `yaml:"env"`
    Tmpl map[string]any `yaml:"template"`
}

func mergeMapsRecursively(dst, src map[string]any) map[string]any {
    res := make(map[string]any)

    for dstKey, dstVal := range dst {
        srcVal, exists := src[dstKey]
        if !exists {
            res[dstKey] = dstVal
            continue
        }

        dstValMap, dstValIsMap := dstVal.(map[string]any)
        srcValMap, srcValIsMap := srcVal.(map[string]any)
        if dstValIsMap && srcValIsMap {
            res[dstKey] = mergeMapsRecursively(dstValMap, srcValMap)
        } else {
            res[dstKey] = srcVal
        }
    }

    for srcKey, srcVal := range src {
        if _, exists := dst[srcKey]; !exists {
            res[srcKey] = srcVal
        }
    }

    return res
}

func main() {
    var a, b T

    if err := yaml.Unmarshal([]byte(data1), &a); err != nil {
        panic(err)
    }

    if err := yaml.Unmarshal([]byte(data2), &b); err != nil {
        panic(err)
    }

    fmt.Printf("%#v\n%#v\n%#v\n", a.Tmpl, b.Tmpl, mergeMapsRecursively(a.Tmpl, b.Tmpl))
}
Copy after login

Playground Link.

mergeMapsRecursively Function recursively merges fields that exist in two maps (if they are both maps), or replaces the value in dst with src value in , otherwise — just like maps.Copy does.

If this isn't exactly what you asked for, I hope my example will get you on the right track anyway.

The above is the detailed content of Merge two mapping hierarchies from YAML files, preserving all keys. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement of this Website
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap

Video Face Swap

Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1

Notepad++7.3.1

Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version

SublimeText3 Chinese version

Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1

Zend Studio 13.0.1

Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6

Dreamweaver CS6

Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version

SublimeText3 Mac version

God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Java Tutorial
1657
14
PHP Tutorial
1257
29
C# Tutorial
1231
24
Golang's Purpose: Building Efficient and Scalable Systems Golang's Purpose: Building Efficient and Scalable Systems Apr 09, 2025 pm 05:17 PM

Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang and C  : Concurrency vs. Raw Speed Golang and C : Concurrency vs. Raw Speed Apr 21, 2025 am 12:16 AM

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Golang vs. Python: Key Differences and Similarities Golang vs. Python: Key Differences and Similarities Apr 17, 2025 am 12:15 AM

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang vs. Python: Performance and Scalability Golang vs. Python: Performance and Scalability Apr 19, 2025 am 12:18 AM

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

C   and Golang: When Performance is Crucial C and Golang: When Performance is Crucial Apr 13, 2025 am 12:11 AM

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.

The Performance Race: Golang vs. C The Performance Race: Golang vs. C Apr 16, 2025 am 12:07 AM

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.

Golang's Impact: Speed, Efficiency, and Simplicity Golang's Impact: Speed, Efficiency, and Simplicity Apr 14, 2025 am 12:11 AM

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and C  : The Trade-offs in Performance Golang and C : The Trade-offs in Performance Apr 17, 2025 am 12:18 AM

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

See all articles