Nginx reverse proxy on nixOS returns 404 when trying to load css/js
php editor Baicao introduced that when using Nginx reverse proxy on nixOS, you sometimes encounter a problem: a 404 error is returned when trying to load css/js. This problem may cause the website's style and functionality to not display properly. In order to solve this problem, we need to check whether the Nginx configuration and file path are correct, and ensure that the proxy server can correctly access and load the required static resources. Through careful troubleshooting and debugging, we can solve this problem and ensure the normal operation of the website.
Question content
I have set up nixos
to run nginx
as a reverse proxy for docker containers. Running a golang
server in a docker container that uses functions to handle /
and returns files from two folders static
and js
. It runs on port 8181. The code is as follows:
func main() { static := http.fileserver(http.dir("static")) js := http.fileserver(http.dir("js")) http.handle("/static/", http.stripprefix("/static/", static)) http.handle("/js/", http.stripprefix("/js/", js)) // register function to "/" http.handlefunc("/", indexhandler) fmt.println("server is starting...") err := http.listenandserve("0.0.0.0:8181", nil) if err != nil { log.fatal("cannot listen and server", err) } } func indexhandler(w http.responsewriter, r *http.request) { wd, err := os.getwd() var static = filepath.join(wd, "static") var index = filepath.join(static, "index.html") if err != nil { log.fatal("cannot get working directory", err) } // check if the request is an options preflight request if r.method == "options" { // respond with status ok to preflight requests w.writeheader(http.statusok) return } // post-request if r.method == http.methodpost { // do something } else { // loading the index.html without any data tmpl, err := template.parsefiles(index) err = tmpl.execute(w, nil) // write response to w if err != nil { http.error(w, err.error(), http.statusinternalservererror) log.fatal("problem with parsing the index template ", err) } } }
The structure of my application is as follows.
├── web │ ├── dockerfile │ ├── go.mod │ ├── server.go │ └── static │ │ ├── index.html │ │ ├── style.css │ │ └── table.html │ └── js │ └── htmx.min.js
nginx part in
configuration.nix
is as follows.
services.nginx = { enable = true; recommendedGzipSettings = true; recommendedOptimisation = true; recommendedProxySettings = true; recommendedTlsSettings = true; virtualHosts."myapp" = { sslCertificate = "/etc/ssl/nginx/ssl.cert"; sslCertificateKey = "/etc/ssl/nginx/ssl.key"; sslTrustedCertificate = "/etc/ssl/nginx/ssl.chain"; forceSSL = true; # Redirect HTTP to HTTPS locations = { "/myapp" = { proxyPass = "http://localhost:8181/"; }; }; extraConfig = '' proxy_set_header Host $host; proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme; proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr; proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for; ''; }; };
When I address https://server/myapp
, index.html
will load, but style.css
and htmx. min.js
will return 404.
When the container is addressed using port 8181 instead of the url (http://server:8181
), everything will load as usual.
I want nginx to redirect requests to load css and js to the container.
edit:
The exact error is: get https://server.name/static/style.css net::err_aborted 404
even though I'm accessing https://server.name/myapp
.
Another important information is that I want to run multiple containers this way through the same reverse proxy. Therefore, directing als css
- or js
-files to the same location will not work.
Solution
Please check the css/js reference in the index.html
file. You'll most likely reference them via absolute paths, like this:
<html> <head> <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/static/style.css" /> <script src="/js/htmx.min.js"></script> </head> </html>
A quick fix is to replace them with relative paths:
<html> <head> <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="./static/style.css" /> <script src="./js/htmx.min.js"></script> </head> </html>
This method is error-prone. A better approach is to modify the application to serve the content at /myapp
:
http.handle("/myapp/static/", http.stripprefix("/myapp/static/", static)) http.handle("/myapp/js/", http.stripprefix("/myapp/js/", js)) http.handlefunc("/myapp/", indexhandler)
And modify the reference path in the index.html
file:
<html> <head> <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/myapp/static/style.css" /> <script src="/myapp/js/htmx.min.js"></script> </head> </html>
Then modify the nginx configuration:
locations = { "/myapp/" = { proxyPass = "http://localhost:8181/myapp/"; }; };
With this approach, the web application will always be served on uri /myapp/
regardless of whether a reverse proxy is used, which should make it easy to maintain.
The above is the detailed content of Nginx reverse proxy on nixOS returns 404 when trying to load css/js. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goisidealforbeginnersandsuitableforcloudandnetworkservicesduetoitssimplicity,efficiency,andconcurrencyfeatures.1)InstallGofromtheofficialwebsiteandverifywith'goversion'.2)Createandrunyourfirstprogramwith'gorunhello.go'.3)Exploreconcurrencyusinggorout

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.
