io.Reader and fmt.Fscan infinite loop
php editor Strawberry will introduce to you the infinite loop problem of io.Reader and fmt.Fscan in this article. When using the fmt.Fscan function to read input, if the read content does not match the input format, an infinite loop will occur. This problem may cause us a lot of trouble, but with some tips and precautions, we can easily solve this problem. Next, we will explain in detail how to avoid infinite loops in io.Reader and fmt.Fscan to help you better use these two functions.
Question content
I don’t know why, but my io.reader
implementation seems to have some kind of flaw?
io.reader
states that it should be fine to return a non-zero byte count and a non-zero error:
it may return the (non-nil) error from the same call or return the error (and n == 0) from a subsequent call. an instance of this general case is that a reader returning a non-zero number of bytes at the end of the input stream may return either err == eof or err == nil. the next read should return 0, eof. callers should always process the n > 0 bytes returned before considering the error err. doing so correctly handles i/o errors that happen after reading some bytes and also both of the allowed eof behaviors.
But this has no effect on fmt.fscan
, instead it hangs the program:
package main import ( "fmt" "io" ) type byte byte func (b byte) read(p []byte) (n int, err error) { if len(p) == 0 { return 0, io.errshortbuffer } p[0] = byte(b) return 1, io.eof } func main() { var n int b := byte('9') z, err := fmt.fscan(b, &n) fmt.println(n, z, err) }
Of course, if I use io.eof
by itself it works if it returns a zero byte count:
type Byte struct { v byte eof bool } func (b *Byte) Read(p []byte) (n int, err error) { if len(p) == 0 { return 0, io.ErrShortBuffer } if b.eof { return 0, io.EOF } p[0] = b.v b.eof = true return 1, nil } func main() { var n int b := Byte{v: '9'} z, err := fmt.Fscan(&b, &n) fmt.Println(n, z, err) }
Is there a flaw in my original implementation, or should I not rely on this specific logging behavior of io.reader
and always return alone when there is no more data to read 0, io.eof
?
Workaround
fmt.scanf
does handle return count and io.eof
correctly, but even in io.eof
Afterwards, your reader continues to return values.
Since the scanner implementation relies on using io.readfull
, which uses io.readatleast
, you will need a more complete implementation to handle duplicate reads. You can test this by using an extended version that traces eof and on the first read
returns io.eof
it will still work as expected with fmt.fscan
use together.
Main excerpts from the documentation:
io.readfull
:
...it does not treat eof in read as an error to report
io.readatleast
:
The error will be eof only if no bytes were read.
Because these io
helpers need to interpret io.eof
themselves, their callers can only look up the actual data returned, and since your reader continues to return data, They will be called repeatedly indefinitely. This can be easily demonstrated by calling io.readall
repeatedly on the reader, returning another value each time.
b := Byte('9') fmt.Println(io.ReadAll(b)) fmt.Println(io.ReadAll(b)) fmt.Println(io.ReadAll(b)) // [57] <nil> // [57] <nil> // [57] <nil>
https://www.php.cn/link/ad6fff7b7be06acff1c63ced9f0da4ea
The above is the detailed content of io.Reader and fmt.Fscan infinite loop. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.
