How to unmarshal JSON into fields using a common interface
php editor Xinyi introduces you how to use a common interface to unmarshal JSON into fields. In development, we often need to parse the received JSON data into fields so that the data can be easily manipulated and processed. Generic interfaces provide a simple and flexible way to achieve this goal. By using the common interface, we can pass a string containing JSON data to the unmarshalling method and get the parsed fields for subsequent processing. This method is not only simple and easy to use, but also suitable for various types of JSON data parsing. Let's learn how to unmarshal JSON into fields using a common interface!
Question content
I have a generic response object with the following structure:
type response struct { data data `json:"data"` error string `json:"error,omitempty"` nextpagetoken string `json:"next_page_token,omitempty"` }
data
The type is an interface and has many implementations (such as pingresponse, etc.). How to unmarshal response
to its underlying type? The complete example is as follows, it always triggers the error error: json: cannot unmarshal object into go struct field response.data of type main.data
:
type Response struct { Data Data `json:"data"` Error string `json:"error,omitempty"` NextPageToken string `json:"next_page_token,omitempty"` } type Data interface{ Foo() } type TypeA struct { Field1 string `json:"field1"` Field2 int `json:"field2"` } func (a *TypeA) Foo() {} type TypeB struct { Field3 float64 `json:"field3"` } func (b *TypeB) Foo() {} func main() { jsonStr := `{ "data": { "field1": "some string", "field2": 123 }, "error": "", "next_page_token": "" }` var response Response err := json.Unmarshal([]byte(jsonStr), &response) if err != nil { fmt.Println("error:", err) return } switch data := response.Data.(type) { case *TypeA: fmt.Println("TypeA:", data.Field1, data.Field2) case *TypeB: fmt.Println("TypeB:", data.Field3) default: fmt.Println("Unknown type") } }
Workaround
You must tell encoding/json
which concrete type to unmarshal to. This package cannot do this for you.
Assume typea
and typeb
are defined as:
type typea struct { fielda string `json:"field"` } type typeb struct { fieldb string `json:"field"` }
In this case, it is impossible to decide which type to unmarshal to.
Regarding your example, we can tell encoding/json
the type to unmarshal as follows:
- var response response + response := response{data: &typea{}}
If you don't know the type beforehand, you can marshal it to map[string]interface{}
:
type response struct { - data data `json:"data"` + data map[string]interface{} `json:"data"` error string `json:"error,omitempty"` nextpagetoken string `json:"next_page_token,omitempty"` }
And determine the type as follows:
if field1, ok := response.data["field1"]; ok { fmt.println("typea:", field1, response.data["field2"]) } else { if field3, ok := response.data["field3"]; ok { fmt.println("typeb:", field3) } else { fmt.println("unknown type") } }
Another solution is to embed type information in json:
jsonStr := `{ "data": { "field1": "some string", "field2": 123 }, + type": "A", "error": "", "next_page_token": "" }` type Response struct { - Data Data `json:"data"` + Data json.RawMessage `json:"data"` + Type string `json:"type"` Error string `json:"error,omitempty"` NextPageToken string `json:"next_page_token,omitempty"` }
Then decode response.data
based on the value of response.type
. See the example provided by encoding/json
: https://pkg.go.dev/encoding/json#example-rawmessage-unmarshal.
The above is the detailed content of How to unmarshal JSON into fields using a common interface. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.
