Unmarshal YAML into complex objects, either structs or strings
php editor strawberry introduction: YAML is a lightweight data serialization format. It has a concise and easy-to-read syntax and is widely used for configuration files and data exchange. In PHP, we can use the YAML parsing library to unmarshal YAML data into complex objects, which can be structures or strings. This provides developers with a convenient way to handle and manipulate configuration files and other data. Whether building complex applications or simplifying configuration management, YAML parsing plays an important role in PHP.
Question content
Try to unmarshal yaml into complex objects, such as map[string]map[interface{}]string
.
The problem is that I want to be able to differentiate between the string
and the source
part of the interface{}
, which is a struct.
type source struct { id string `yaml:"id"` name string `yaml:"name"` logoid string `yaml:"logoid"` url string `yaml:"url"` } type unft struct { itemmeta map[string]map[interface{}]string `yaml:"item_meta"` // could be // itemmeta map[string]map[string]string `yaml:"item_meta"` // or // itemmeta map[string]map[source]string `yaml:"item_meta"` }
Apparently yaml doesn't know how to unmarshal into a source
structure, so I have to implement the unmarshaler
interface:
type unmarshaler interface { unmarshalyaml(value *node) error }
But I don't quite understand the overall situation of the unmarshalling process. Generally speaking, I assume I have to manually iterate through *yaml.node
and call func unmarshalyaml(value *node) error
on each node.
package main import ( "fmt" "gopkg.in/yaml.v3" ) type Source struct { ID string `json:"id"` Name string `json:"name"` LogoID string `json:"logoId"` URL string `json:"url"` } var data = ` unf: item_meta: source: !struct ? id: "data-watch" name: "DataWatch" logoid: "data-watch" url: "https" : "product_any('SS')" public_usage: "": "source_any('SDF')" "provider": "source_any('ANO')"` type UNFT struct { ItemMeta map[string]map[interface{}]string `yaml:"item_meta"` } type MetaConverterConfigT struct { UNFT UNFT `yaml:"unf"` } func main() { cfg := MetaConverterConfigT{} err := yaml.Unmarshal([]byte(data), &cfg) if err != nil { fmt.Println("%w", err) } fmt.Println(cfg) } func (s *UNFT) UnmarshalYAML(n *yaml.Node) error { var cfg map[string]map[interface{}]string if err := n.Decode(&cfg); err != nil { fmt.Println("%w", err) } return nil }
Go to the amusement park
Solution
type metakey struct { string string source source } func (k *metakey) unmarshalyaml(n *yaml.node) error { if n.tag == "!!str" { return n.decode(&k.string) } if n.tag == "!!map" { return n.decode(&k.source) } return fmt.errorf("unsupported metakey type") } // ... type unft struct { itemmeta map[string]map[metakey]string `yaml:"item_meta"` }
https://www.php.cn/link/50f9999b2ee27e222c5513e945e9ea9c
If you need to keep the mapping type unchanged, i.e. without adding a custom key type, then you can also implement the unmarshaller on unft and just remap using any
:
type UNFT struct { ItemMeta map[string]map[any]string `yaml:"item_meta"` } func (u *UNFT) UnmarshalYAML(n *yaml.Node) error { var obj struct { ItemMeta map[string]map[MetaKey]string `yaml:"item_meta"` } if err := n.Decode(&obj); err != nil { return err } u.ItemMeta = make(map[string]map[any]string, len(obj.ItemMeta)) for k, v := range obj.ItemMeta { m := make(map[any]string, len(v)) for k, v := range v { if k.Source != (Source{}) { m[k.Source] = v } else { m[k.String] = v } } u.ItemMeta[k] = m } return nil }
https://www.php.cn/link/543378fb36a83810ded2d725f2b6c883
The above is the detailed content of Unmarshal YAML into complex objects, either structs or strings. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goisidealforbeginnersandsuitableforcloudandnetworkservicesduetoitssimplicity,efficiency,andconcurrencyfeatures.1)InstallGofromtheofficialwebsiteandverifywith'goversion'.2)Createandrunyourfirstprogramwith'gorunhello.go'.3)Exploreconcurrencyusinggorout

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.
