Conditionally render multiple sections in Hugo
In Hugo, there is a very useful feature that can render multiple parts based on conditions. This feature allows us to show/hide certain parts of the page based on specific situations or conditions. Whether we are building a static website or a dynamic website, this conditional rendering function can help us more flexibly control the way the page is presented. In this article, I will discuss with you how to implement conditional rendering of multiple parts in Hugo and its usage scenarios.
Question content
I want to render all markdown files in each folder except the static files in the homepage of the website. One way is to use union in hugo, but with The number of folders increases and I find myself repeating union everywhere (the code with the union is commented out, and it's working by the way), so I thought using slices would be a better idea, but when I try When using slices I get the following error -
Failed to render page: "home" failed to render: "(directory path)\layouts\index.html:12:19": Execution of template at <.pages> failed: Unable to evaluate field in page of type string
Directory Structure
index.html code
{{ define "main" }} <ul class="homepage-topic-sections-container"> {{$sectionNames := slice "posts" "problems" "tutorials"}} {{range $index, $sectionName := $sectionNames}} {{ range where .Pages "Section" $sectionName }} {{/* {{ range union (union (where .Pages "Section" "posts") (where .Pages "Section" "problems")) (where .Pages "Section" "tutorials") }} */}} <li> <section class="homepage-topic-section"> <h1 class="topic-heading"><a href="{{.Permalink}}">{{.Title}} </a></h1> <div> {{ range .Pages }} <h3><a href="{{.Permalink}}">{{.Title}} · {{.Date.Format "January 2, 2006"}}</a></h3> {{ end }} </div> </section> </li> {{end}} {{end}} </ul> {{ end }}
Solution
https://www.php.cn/link/1330fef5fe4f742c1918c585c2da13b3一个>:
Context (aka "dot")
The most overlooked concept about go templates is {{ . }}
Always refer to the current context.
- At the top level of the template, this will be the dataset available for the template to use.
- However, inside the iteration, it will have the value of the current item in the loop ; i.e.
{{ . }}
will no longer reference the data available to the entire page.
In the code below, the points in .pages
have the value of the current item in the first range
operation. The value's type is string, and it has no field pages
. That's why it failed, execute of template failed at <.pages>: can'tvaluate field pages in type string
.
{{ define "main" }} <ul class="homepage-topic-sections-container"> {{$sectionnames := slice "posts" "problems" "tutorials"}} {{range $index, $sectionname := $sectionnames}} {{ range where .pages "section" $sectionname }} ^^^^^^
One possible fix is to use $.
to access the global context: .pages
==> $.pages
.
Perhaps a better solution would be to list the exclude section. Then there is no need to modify the code when adding more folders:
{{ define "main" }} <ul class="homepage-topic-sections-container"> {{ range where .Pages "Section" "!=" "static" }} <li>
The above is the detailed content of Conditionally render multiple sections in Hugo. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.
