


What is the correct way to achieve graceful shutdown of background processes in Uber FX?
What is the correct way to achieve graceful shutdown of background processes in Uber FX? This is a common problem that many people encounter when using Uber FX. As a powerful background task processing framework, Uber FX provides a simple and effective way to manage and process background tasks. In this article, PHP editor Zimo will introduce you how to correctly close the background process to ensure the stability and normal operation of the program.
Question content
Suppose I have a service in my Uber FX application that is supposed to perform some background activity, such as polling an external API. I can run background tasks by triggering a goroutine, but what is the correct way to stop them?
As a possible implementation, let us consider the following example:
package main import ( "context" "log" "sync" "time" "go.uber.org/fx" ) type AwesomeService struct { // context to use for background processes bg context.Context // to trigger background processes stopping cancel context.CancelFunc // to wait for background processes to gracefully finish wg *sync.WaitGroup } func New(lc fx.Lifecycle) *AwesomeService { bg, cancel := context.WithCancel(context.Background()) service := &AwesomeService{ bg: bg, cancel: cancel, wg: new(sync.WaitGroup), } lc.Append(fx.Hook{ OnStart: service.start, OnStop: service.stop, }) return service } func (s *AwesomeService) start(_ context.Context) error { s.runBackgroundProcess() log.Println("Start done") return nil } func (s *AwesomeService) stop(_ context.Context) error { s.cancel() s.wg.Wait() log.Println("Stop done") return nil } // runBackgroundProcess does some work till context is done. func (s *AwesomeService) runBackgroundProcess() { s.wg.Add(1) go func() { defer s.wg.Done() for { select { case <-s.bg.Done(): return case <-time.After(1 * time.Second): log.Println("Working...") } } }() } func main() { fx.New( fx.Provide(New), fx.Invoke(func(*AwesomeService) {}), ).Run() }
Some notes:
- The service is connected to the application lifecycle by using the
fx.Lifecycle
hook. - I can't rely on and use the context in the
OnStart
/OnStop
methods because they are different contexts and correspond to start/stop activities, not the app lifecycle context.
Concerns and Questions:
- The example given is quite heavy on tracking background tasks. Additionally, storing context in a struct is an anti-pattern. Is there any way to simplify this?
- Should I wait for the goroutine to complete if there are no resources to release?
Workaround
In my opinion, using a context is just fine, but you can also communicate the shutdown signal via a channel to any Go routine you want. See sample code below.
Yes, you should also wait for the wait group count to return to zero before closing the application completely. So you first close the channel and then wait on the wait group.
package main import ( "context" "log" "sync" "time" "go.uber.org/fx" ) type AwesomeService struct { // channel to shutdown background processes shutdown chan struct{} // to wait for background processes to gracefully finish wg *sync.WaitGroup } func New(lc fx.Lifecycle) *AwesomeService { service := &AwesomeService{ shutdown: make(chan struct{}), wg: new(sync.WaitGroup), } lc.Append(fx.Hook{ OnStart: service.start, OnStop: service.stop, }) return service } func (s *AwesomeService) start(_ context.Context) error { s.runBackgroundProcess() log.Println("Start done") return nil } func (s *AwesomeService) stop(_ context.Context) error { close(s.shutdown) s.wg.Wait() log.Println("Stop done") return nil } // runBackgroundProcess does some work till context is done. func (s *AwesomeService) runBackgroundProcess() { s.wg.Add(1) go func() { defer s.wg.Done() for { select { case <-s.shutdown: return case <-time.After(1 * time.Second): log.Println("Working...") } } }() } func main() { fx.New( fx.Provide(New), fx.Invoke(func(*AwesomeService) {}), ).Run() }
The above is the detailed content of What is the correct way to achieve graceful shutdown of background processes in Uber FX?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goisidealforbeginnersandsuitableforcloudandnetworkservicesduetoitssimplicity,efficiency,andconcurrencyfeatures.1)InstallGofromtheofficialwebsiteandverifywith'goversion'.2)Createandrunyourfirstprogramwith'gorunhello.go'.3)Exploreconcurrencyusinggorout

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.

Golangisidealforbuildingscalablesystemsduetoitsefficiencyandconcurrency,whilePythonexcelsinquickscriptinganddataanalysisduetoitssimplicityandvastecosystem.Golang'sdesignencouragesclean,readablecodeanditsgoroutinesenableefficientconcurrentoperations,t
