Table of Contents
Question content
Workaround
Home Backend Development Golang Validate input fields using two possible names

Validate input fields using two possible names

Feb 08, 2024 pm 10:33 PM

Validate input fields using two possible names

php Xiaobian Strawberry introduces you a method to verify the input field: use two possible names for verification. Validation of input fields is a very important step when developing a website or application. By using two possible names, you can increase the security and accuracy of your input fields. This method validates by comparing the actual name of the input field with an alternate name. If both names match, the input field is considered valid. This verification method avoids problems caused by user input errors or malicious input and provides more reliable data protection.

Question content

I am migrating an API originally written in Python. The Python API allows you to send requests as camelCase or snake_case as follows:

This is allowed

<code>{
    "someInput": "nice"
}
</code>
Copy after login

This is allowed

<code>{
    "some_input": "nice"
}
</code>
Copy after login

This is done using a great Python library: Pydantic

<code>from pydantic import BaseModel

def to_camel(string):
    words = string.split('_')
    return words[0] + ''.join(word.capitalize() for word in words[1:])

class InputModel(BaseModel):
    some_input: str

    class Config:
        alias_generator = to_camel
        allow_population_by_field_name = True
</code>
Copy after login

This allows the creation of InputModels by alias (someInput) or field name (some_input). I want to do the same or equivalent thing in Go. I'm using gin:

<code>func Routes(router *gin.Engine) {
    v1 := router.Group("/v1")
    {
        v1.POST("/shipments", controllers.ShipmentCreator)
    }
}

func ShipmentCreator(ctx *gin.Context) {
    ResponseController := new(internal.OutputModel)
    var body domain.ShipmentsInputModel
    if err := ctx.BindJSON(&body); err != nil {
        fmt.Println(err)
    }
    validate := validator.New()
    err := validate.Struct(body)
    if err != nil {
        var validationErrors validator.ValidationErrors
        errors.As(err, &validationErrors)
        for _, validationError := range validationErrors {
            ResponseController.AddError(internal.ErrorsModel{
                Parameter: validationError.Field(),
                Message:   validationError.Error(),
            })
        }
        ctx.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, ResponseController)
        return
    }

</code>
Copy after login

My input structure looks like this:

<code>type ShipmentsInputModel struct {
    LotId   string   `json:"lotId" tag:"lot_id" alias:"lot_id" validate:"required"`
}
</code>
Copy after login

This doesn't work when my input is:

<code>{
   "lot_id": "someLotId"
}
</code>
Copy after login

It returns:

"message": "Key: 'ShipmentsInputModel.LotId' Error:Field validation for 'LotId' failed on the 'required' tag",
Copy after login

How can I accept both camelCase and snake_case?

Workaround

In Go, you cannot provide two JSON tags for a single struct field at the same time. JSON tags are specified using a single string that defines how a field should be marshaled (serialized to JSON) or unmarshaled (deserialized from JSON). You cannot directly specify multiple labels for a single field in a structure.

If you need to support CamelCase and SnakeCase in JSON output, you typically have to choose a consistent naming convention for the structure fields and then use the appropriate JSON markup for all fields.

There is a clever way to do this. I hope this helps.

    package main
    
    import (
        "encoding/json"
        "fmt"
    )
    
    type ShipmentsInputModel struct {
        LotID
    }
    
    type LotID struct {
        LotId  string `json:"lotId,omitempty"`
        Lot_ID string `json:"lot_id,omitempty"`
    }
    
    func (s *ShipmentsInputModel) setLodID(id string) {
        s.LotId = id
        s.Lot_ID = id
    }
    
    func main() {
        shipment := ShipmentsInputModel{}
        shipment.setLodID("someLotID")
    
        // Convert struct to JSON
        jsonData, err := json.Marshal(shipment)
        if err != nil {
            fmt.Println("Error:", err)
            return
        }
        // prints: {"lotId":"someLotID","lot_id":"someLotID"}
        fmt.Println(string(jsonData))
    }
Copy after login

The above is the detailed content of Validate input fields using two possible names. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement of this Website
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap

Video Face Swap

Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1

Notepad++7.3.1

Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version

SublimeText3 Chinese version

Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1

Zend Studio 13.0.1

Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6

Dreamweaver CS6

Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version

SublimeText3 Mac version

God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Java Tutorial
1664
14
PHP Tutorial
1268
29
C# Tutorial
1243
24
Golang vs. Python: Performance and Scalability Golang vs. Python: Performance and Scalability Apr 19, 2025 am 12:18 AM

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang and C  : Concurrency vs. Raw Speed Golang and C : Concurrency vs. Raw Speed Apr 21, 2025 am 12:16 AM

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Golang's Impact: Speed, Efficiency, and Simplicity Golang's Impact: Speed, Efficiency, and Simplicity Apr 14, 2025 am 12:11 AM

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang vs. Python: Key Differences and Similarities Golang vs. Python: Key Differences and Similarities Apr 17, 2025 am 12:15 AM

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang vs. C  : Performance and Speed Comparison Golang vs. C : Performance and Speed Comparison Apr 21, 2025 am 12:13 AM

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Golang and C  : The Trade-offs in Performance Golang and C : The Trade-offs in Performance Apr 17, 2025 am 12:18 AM

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

C   and Golang: When Performance is Crucial C and Golang: When Performance is Crucial Apr 13, 2025 am 12:11 AM

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.

The Performance Race: Golang vs. C The Performance Race: Golang vs. C Apr 16, 2025 am 12:07 AM

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.

See all articles