Validate input fields using two possible names
php Xiaobian Strawberry introduces you a method to verify the input field: use two possible names for verification. Validation of input fields is a very important step when developing a website or application. By using two possible names, you can increase the security and accuracy of your input fields. This method validates by comparing the actual name of the input field with an alternate name. If both names match, the input field is considered valid. This verification method avoids problems caused by user input errors or malicious input and provides more reliable data protection.
Question content
I am migrating an API originally written in Python. The Python API allows you to send requests as camelCase or snake_case as follows:
This is allowed
<code>{ "someInput": "nice" } </code>
This is allowed
<code>{ "some_input": "nice" } </code>
This is done using a great Python library: Pydantic
<code>from pydantic import BaseModel def to_camel(string): words = string.split('_') return words[0] + ''.join(word.capitalize() for word in words[1:]) class InputModel(BaseModel): some_input: str class Config: alias_generator = to_camel allow_population_by_field_name = True </code>
This allows the creation of InputModels by alias (someInput) or field name (some_input). I want to do the same or equivalent thing in Go. I'm using gin:
<code>func Routes(router *gin.Engine) { v1 := router.Group("/v1") { v1.POST("/shipments", controllers.ShipmentCreator) } } func ShipmentCreator(ctx *gin.Context) { ResponseController := new(internal.OutputModel) var body domain.ShipmentsInputModel if err := ctx.BindJSON(&body); err != nil { fmt.Println(err) } validate := validator.New() err := validate.Struct(body) if err != nil { var validationErrors validator.ValidationErrors errors.As(err, &validationErrors) for _, validationError := range validationErrors { ResponseController.AddError(internal.ErrorsModel{ Parameter: validationError.Field(), Message: validationError.Error(), }) } ctx.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, ResponseController) return } </code>
My input structure looks like this:
<code>type ShipmentsInputModel struct { LotId string `json:"lotId" tag:"lot_id" alias:"lot_id" validate:"required"` } </code>
This doesn't work when my input is:
<code>{ "lot_id": "someLotId" } </code>
It returns:
"message": "Key: 'ShipmentsInputModel.LotId' Error:Field validation for 'LotId' failed on the 'required' tag",
How can I accept both camelCase and snake_case?
Workaround
In Go, you cannot provide two JSON tags for a single struct field at the same time. JSON tags are specified using a single string that defines how a field should be marshaled (serialized to JSON) or unmarshaled (deserialized from JSON). You cannot directly specify multiple labels for a single field in a structure.
If you need to support CamelCase and SnakeCase in JSON output, you typically have to choose a consistent naming convention for the structure fields and then use the appropriate JSON markup for all fields.
There is a clever way to do this. I hope this helps.
package main import ( "encoding/json" "fmt" ) type ShipmentsInputModel struct { LotID } type LotID struct { LotId string `json:"lotId,omitempty"` Lot_ID string `json:"lot_id,omitempty"` } func (s *ShipmentsInputModel) setLodID(id string) { s.LotId = id s.Lot_ID = id } func main() { shipment := ShipmentsInputModel{} shipment.setLodID("someLotID") // Convert struct to JSON jsonData, err := json.Marshal(shipment) if err != nil { fmt.Println("Error:", err) return } // prints: {"lotId":"someLotID","lot_id":"someLotID"} fmt.Println(string(jsonData)) }
The above is the detailed content of Validate input fields using two possible names. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.
