


go-jwt token validation error - invalid token signature: Invalid key type
php editor Zimo may encounter the error message: "Invalid token signature: Invalid key type" when using go-jwt for token verification. This error is caused by a mismatch between the token's signature and the key type. The token signature is an important part of validating the token, and the key type specifies the algorithm used to generate and verify the signature. To solve this problem, we need to ensure that the token's signing algorithm is consistent with the key type. Next, we will detail how to properly configure and use go-jwt to avoid this error.
Problem content
Error occurred
token signature is invalid: key is of invalid type
When trying to verify the jwt token. Use golang-jwt (v5) library.
Here's how I generate the token:
const ( secretkey = "162475e134198bd451af0b88a5defe132c72cb26fd58449772883b90c498b484" tokenlifespan = 4 ) func generatetoken() (string, error) { claims := jwt.mapclaims{} claims["authorized"] = true claims["foo"] = "bar" claims["exp"] = time.now().add(time.hour * time.duration(tokenlifespan)).unix() token := jwt.newwithclaims(jwt.signingmethodhs256, claims) return token.signedstring([]byte(secretkey)) }
This is the generated token:
This is how I verify the token:
func ValidateToken(c *gin.Context) error { token, err := GetToken(c) if err != nil { return err } _, ok := token.Claims.(jwt.MapClaims) if ok && token.Valid { return nil } return errors.New("invalid token provided") } func GetToken(c *gin.Context) (*jwt.Token, error) { tokenString := getTokenFromRequest(c) token, err := jwt.Parse(tokenString, func(token *jwt.Token) (interface{}, error) { if _, ok := token.Method.(*jwt.SigningMethodHMAC); !ok { return nil, fmt.Errorf("unexpected signing method: %v", token.Header["alg"]) } return token, nil }) return token, err } func getTokenFromRequest(c *gin.Context) string { bearerToken := c.Request.Header.Get("Authorization") splitToken := strings.Split(bearerToken, " ") if len(splitToken) == 2 { return splitToken[1] } return "" }
Any suggestions how to get it working? What am I missing? Thanks.
Workaround
keyfunc Use the parse method as a callback function to provide the verification key. So it should return a key instead of parameter token *jwt.token
.
token, err := jwt.Parse(tokenString, func(token *jwt.Token) (interface{}, error) { if _, ok := token.Method.(*jwt.SigningMethodHMAC); !ok { return nil, fmt.Errorf("unexpected signing method: %v", token.Header["alg"]) } - return token, nil + return []byte(secretKey), nil })
The above is the detailed content of go-jwt token validation error - invalid token signature: Invalid key type. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goisidealforbeginnersandsuitableforcloudandnetworkservicesduetoitssimplicity,efficiency,andconcurrencyfeatures.1)InstallGofromtheofficialwebsiteandverifywith'goversion'.2)Createandrunyourfirstprogramwith'gorunhello.go'.3)Exploreconcurrencyusinggorout

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.
