How does the server know that the client no longer exists?
I'm trying to understand how TCP works and all I know so far is that if a "random" disconnect occurs, one side There's no way of knowing if the other side still exists. This is why some PING/PONG algorithms or TCP keep-alive are used. I created a simple client-server application where the client connects to the server and sends a simple message after 10 seconds. What confuses me is how the server knows the client no longer exists in the following two cases:
- I let the program run completely and complete - in which case the server closes the connection (I don't understand how the server knows the client is no longer around, I didn't indicate anywhere on the client that I was closing the connection)
- I closed the client process before it finished (before it sent a message to the server) - in this case the server printed the following message
Error Reading: read tcp 127.0.0.1:8080->127.0. 0.1:60845: wsarecv: The existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host.
(Again, I don't understand how it knows the client no longer exists)
I'm assuming that the operating system (or golang net
library) is involved, and that it handles this situation by sending an additional message or similar before the TCP connection is actually closed.
Any help welcome. Below is the full code I used so you can run it locally or in the online Go Playground.
client.go
package main import ( "fmt" "net" "time" ) func main() { // Connect to the server conn, err := net.Dial("tcp", "localhost:8080") if err != nil { fmt.Println("Error connecting:", err) return } defer conn.Close() // Send a message to the server message := "Hello from client!" time.Sleep(10000 * time.Millisecond) conn.Write([]byte(message)) // Read the response from the server buffer := make([]byte, 1024) n, err := conn.Read(buffer) if err != nil { fmt.Println("Error reading:", err) return } // Print the server's response fmt.Printf("Received response from server: %s\n", buffer[:n]) }
server.go
package main import ( "fmt" "net" ) func handleConnection(conn net.Conn) { defer conn.Close() // Obtain and print the client's IP address when the connection is established clientAddr := conn.RemoteAddr() fmt.Printf("Client connected from IP address: %s\n", clientAddr) for { // Read data from the client buffer := make([]byte, 1024) n, err := conn.Read(buffer) if err != nil { fmt.Println("Error reading:", err) return } // Print received message fmt.Printf("Received message from client (%s): %s\n", clientAddr, buffer[:n]) // Send a response back to the client response := "Hello from server!" conn.Write([]byte(response)) } } func main() { // Start listening on a port listener, err := net.Listen("tcp", "127.0.0.1:8080") if err != nil { fmt.Println("Error listening:", err) return } defer listener.Close() fmt.Println("Server listening on port 8080") for { // Wait for a connection conn, err := listener.Accept() if err != nil { fmt.Println("Error accepting connection:", err) continue } // Handle the connection in a goroutine go handleConnection(conn) } }
Correct answer
I realized I was talking about something I'm not very familiar with, so I tested it myself. Toy example, in three separate terminals on the same machine:
Supervision: sudo tcpdump -tttt -i lo port 8887
(You may need to find out what your localhost device is, maybe lo0
, use sudo tcpdump -D
. Observe the Flags field: .
is ACK, the others should be self-explanatory.)
Server:nc -l 8887
Client:nc localhost 8887
- Client: SYN
- Server: SYN ACK
- Client:ACK
Enter content in the client and press Enter
- Client: PSH ACK
- Server:ACK
Enter content in the server and press Enter
- Server: PSH ACK
- Client:ACK
a) Stop the client, either via ctrl-c or sigkill:
- Client: FIN ACK
- Server: FIN ACK
- Client:ACK
b) Stop the server:
- Server: FIN ACK
- Client:ACK
Then stop the client:
- Client: FIN ACK
- Server: RST
This experiment was completed on WSL/Ubuntu. I haven't compiled your program yet, but you can test your scenario yourself. One thing that surprised me is that even though I sigkilled the client process, the FIN was still sent, suggesting that if the client process terminates with an open port, it is the kernel's responsibility to send the FIN. Additionally, when the server-side process is stopped, the FIN is not sent, causing the client to encounter an RST response.
The kernel implementation of the TCP protocol handles this; apart from what happens in conn.Close()
, this is completely irrelevant to Go.
The above is the detailed content of How does the server know that the client no longer exists?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.
