html rendering function memory leak
The problem I'm facing is that even trying just 200 requests causes the program to occupy 6gb of the container's memory and ends up being oom kill. My idea is to extract all text nodes present in the html and then process them to extract their name, the html and the text of that tag. So, to generate html for a specific tag, I use the render function from golang.org/x/net/html. Where I provide strings.builder as io.writer to write the generated html. But for some reason the builder takes too much memory.
package main import ( "encoding/csv" "io" "log" "net/http" "strings" "golang.org/x/net/html" ) func main() { mux := http.NewServeMux() mux.HandleFunc("/data", GetData) if err := http.ListenAndServe(":8001", mux); err != nil { log.Println(err) } } type TagInfo struct { Tag string Name string Text string } // http.handler func GetData(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) { u := r.URL.Query().Get("url") doc, err := GetDoc(u) if err != nil { log.Println(err) w.WriteHeader(500) return } var buf strings.Builder data := Extract(doc, &buf) csvw := csv.NewWriter(io.Discard) for _, d := range data { csvw.Write([]string{d.Name, d.Tag, d.Text}) } } // fires request and get text/html func GetDoc(u string) (*html.Node, error) { res, err := http.Get(u) if err != nil { return nil, err } defer res.Body.Close() return html.Parse(res.Body) } func Extract(doc *html.Node, buf *strings.Builder) []TagInfo { var ( tags = make([]TagInfo, 0, 100) f func(*html.Node) ) f = func(n *html.Node) { if n.Type == html.TextNode { text := strings.TrimSpace(n.Data) if text != "" { parent := n.Parent tag := Render(parent, buf) tagInfo := TagInfo{ Tag: tag, Name: parent.Data, Text: n.Data, } tags = append(tags, tagInfo) } } for child := n.FirstChild; child != nil; child = child.NextSibling { f(child) } } f(doc) return tags } // Render the html around the tag // if node is text then pass the // parent node paramter in function func Render(n *html.Node, buf *strings.Builder) string { defer buf.Reset() if err := html.Render(buf, n); err != nil { log.Println(err) return "" } return buf.String() }
If you want a specific list of URLs, here it is. I made about 60 requests at one time.
I tried using bytes.buffer bytes.buffer
and sync.pool
but both have the same problem. Using pprof
I noticed that the writestring method of
strings.builder caused a lot of memory usage.
Correct answer
So the basic question here is to accept any content-type
, which is not acceptable in terms of crawling, most Websites need to send text/html
.
The problem is that even if the url sends anything that does not represent html data golang.org/x/net/html
it is still accepted without throwing an error.
Let's take an example where application/pdf
is returned, then the body will contain html.Parse
the binary data of the parsed pdf and no error will be returned, this is Weird-behavior library for scraping/crawling accepted binary data.
The solution is: Check the response headers, if only the data is html, then continue, otherwise there will be ambiguity or higher memory usage (maybe lower), but we can't predict what will happen occur.
The above is the detailed content of html rendering function memory leak. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.
