My API response body seems to be truncated?
This is my first time getting involved in GO, and the API I use to get stock prices accepts multiple tickers (think stock IDs; NVDA => Nvidia) to reduce my limited API calls. However, when trying to get multiple codes, the body seems to be cut off:
{ "meta ": { "requested ": 2, "returned ": 2 }, "data ": [ { "ticker ": "MSFT ", "name ": "Microsoft Corporation ", "exchange_short ": null, "exchange_long ": null, "mic_code ": "IEXG ", "currency ": "USD ", "price ": 374.72, "day_high ": 376.92, "day_low ": 373.54, "day_open ": 374.94, "52_week_high ": 349.84, "52_week_low ": 213.43, "market_cap ": null, "previous_close_price ": 374.58, "previous_close_price_time ": "2023-12-22T15:59:56.000000 ", "day_change ": 0.04, "volume ": 165558, "is_extended_hours_price ": false, "last_trade_time ": "2023-12-26T16:00:00.000000 " }, { "ticker ": ""
Exact calls to the Stock API directly in Postman return:
{ "meta": { "requested": 2, "returned": 2 }, "data": [ { "ticker": "MSFT", "name": "Microsoft Corporation", "exchange_short": null, "exchange_long": null, "mic_code": "IEXG", "currency": "USD", "price": 374.72, "day_high": 376.92, "day_low": 373.54, "day_open": 374.94, "52_week_high": 349.84, "52_week_low": 213.43, "market_cap": null, "previous_close_price": 374.58, "previous_close_price_time": "2023-12-22T15:59:56.000000", "day_change": 0.04, "volume": 165558, "is_extended_hours_price": false, "last_trade_time": "2023-12-26T16:00:00.000000" }, { "ticker": "PLTR", "name": "Palantir Technologies Inc", "exchange_short": null, "exchange_long": null, "mic_code": "IEXG", "currency": "USD", "price": 17.68, "day_high": 17.75, "day_low": 17.34, "day_open": 17.45, "52_week_high": 17.16, "52_week_low": 5.92, "market_cap": null, "previous_close_price": 17.42, "previous_close_price_time": "2023-12-22T15:59:56.000000", "day_change": 1.47, "volume": 236201, "is_extended_hours_price": false, "last_trade_time": "2023-12-26T15:59:58.000000" } ] }
I think I did something wrong (I had never touched GO before yesterday) The relevant codes are as follows:
func getStockPriceData(ticker string) []Stock { baseURL, _ := url.Parse("https://api.stockdata.org") baseURL.Path += "v1/data/quote" params := url.Values{} params.Add("symbols", ticker) params.Add("api_token", apiToken.ApiToken) baseURL.RawQuery = params.Encode() req, _ := http.NewRequest("GET", baseURL.String(), nil) res, _ := http.DefaultClient.Do(req) defer res.Body.Close() body, err := io.ReadAll(res.Body) if err != nil { panic(err.Error()) } apiResponseData := ApiResponseStockData{} //json.NewDecoder(res.Body).Decode(&apiResponseData) err2 := json.Unmarshal(body, &apiResponseData) if err2 != nil { fmt.Println("whoops:", err2) } stocks := []Stock{} for _, data := range apiResponseData.ResponseStockData { stock := Stock{} stock.Name = data.Name stock.Ticker = data.Ticker stock.Price = data.Price stock.DayHigh = data.DayHigh stock.DayLow = data.DayLow stock.DayOpen = data.DayOpen stock.PreviousClosePrice = data.PreviousClosePrice stock.DayChange = data.DayChange stocks = append(stocks, stock) } return stocks }
Context structure:
type Stock struct { Name string `json:"name"` Ticker string `json:"ticker"` Price float64 `json:"price"` DayHigh float64 `json:"day_high"` DayLow float64 `json:"day_low"` DayOpen float64 `json:"day_open"` DayChange float64 `json:"day_change"` PreviousClosePrice float64 `json:"previous_close_price"` } type ApiResponseStockData struct { ResponseStockData []ResponseData `json:"data"` } type ResponseData struct { Name string `json:"name"` Ticker string `json:"ticker"` ExchangeShort bool `json:"exchange_short"` ExchangeLong bool `json:"exchange_long"` MicCode string `json:"mic_code"` Currency string `json:"currency"` Price float64 `json:"price"` DayHigh float64 `json:"day_high"` DayLow float64 `json:"day_low"` DayOpen float64 `json:"day_open"` DayChange float64 `json:"day_change"` YearHigh float64 `json:"52_week_high"` YearLow float64 `json:"52_week_low"` MarketCap float64 `json:"market_cap"` PreviousClosePrice float64 `json:"previous_close_price"` PreviousCloseTime time.Time `json:"previous_close_time"` Volume float64 `json:"volume"` IsExtendedHoursPrice bool `json:"is_extended_hours_price"` LastTradeTime time.Time `json:"last_trade_time"` }
After looking at a few threads, I tried using json.Unmarshal
and json.NewDecoder().Decode()
but still no luck. The cutoff string above is from the body, which successfully adds a single complete object to the apiResponseData
when using Decode
or Unmarshal
. I can understand if this is a huge response, but this seems so simple that I have to assume I'm making a very obvious rookie mistake.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Correct Answer
You are trying to parse a time string using a format that contains a time zone offset ("Z07:00").
You need to adjust the time layout to the following.
layout := "2006-01-02T15:04:05.000000"
Your error handling is incorrect, that's why you are also able to exit with an incorrect response.
The above is the detailed content of My API response body seems to be truncated?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.
