


What is the difference between microtask queue and callback queue in asynchronous JavaScript?
In asynchronous JavaScript, there are two ways to schedule tasks - Microtask Queue and Callback Queue. The JavaScript engine handles these two queues differently.
Microtask Queue
Microtask Queue is a task queue that is executed after the current task. The microtask queue is processed by the JavaScript engine before moving to the next task in the callback queue.
Example
The following is an example of how the microtask queue works -
<!doctype html> <html> <head> <title>Examples</title> </head> <body> <div id="result"></div> <script> console.log('start'); setTimeout(function() { console.log('setTimeout'); }, 0); Promise.resolve().then(function() { console.log('promise resolve'); }); console.log('end'); </script> </body> </html>
In the above example, the "setTimeout" callback is added to the callback in queue. "Promise.resolve" is added to the microtask queue. The JavaScript engine will first execute all tasks in the microtask queue before entering the callback queue.
So the output of the above code will be (In the console) -
start end promise resolve setTimeout
Callback Queue
Callback Queue is A queue of tasks to be executed after the current task. Callback Queue Processed by the JavaScript engine after executing all tasks in the microtask queue.
Example
The following is an example of how the callback queue works -
<!doctype html> <html> <head> <title>Examples</title> </head> <body> <div id="result"></div> <script> console.log('start'); setTimeout(function() { console.log('setTimeout'); }, 0); console.log('end'); </script> </body> </html>
In the above example, the 'setTimeout' callback is added to the callback queue middle. The JavaScript engine will execute the "setTimeout" callback after executing all code in the current task.
So the output of the above code will be (In the console) -
start end setTimeout
Difference between Microtask Queue and Callback Queue
Microtasks Queues and Callbacks Some differences between Queues are-
##Microtask Queues are processed by the JavaScript engine and then Then move to the next task in the callback queue. CallbackThe queue is processed by the JavaScript engine after all tasks in the microtask queue are executed.
Microtask Processed after the current task of the queue is completed. CallbackThe queue is processed after the microtask queue is empty.
MicrotasksThe queue is processed in a separate event loop. CallbacksThe queue is processed in the same event loop.
- The microtask queue is processed in a separate event loop, which means that if the main thread is blocked, the microtask queue will still
- The microtask queue is processed after the current task is completed, which means Any code that depends on the current task can be added to the microtask queue and it will be processed. Executed immediately after the current task is completed.
- The microtask queue has a higher priority than the callback queue, which means that if both queues are scheduled to execute at the same time, the microtask queue will execute first.
The above is the detailed content of What is the difference between microtask queue and callback queue in asynchronous JavaScript?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.

JavaScript's application in the real world includes front-end and back-end development. 1) Display front-end applications by building a TODO list application, involving DOM operations and event processing. 2) Build RESTfulAPI through Node.js and Express to demonstrate back-end applications.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

Both Python and JavaScript's choices in development environments are important. 1) Python's development environment includes PyCharm, JupyterNotebook and Anaconda, which are suitable for data science and rapid prototyping. 2) The development environment of JavaScript includes Node.js, VSCode and Webpack, which are suitable for front-end and back-end development. Choosing the right tools according to project needs can improve development efficiency and project success rate.

C and C play a vital role in the JavaScript engine, mainly used to implement interpreters and JIT compilers. 1) C is used to parse JavaScript source code and generate an abstract syntax tree. 2) C is responsible for generating and executing bytecode. 3) C implements the JIT compiler, optimizes and compiles hot-spot code at runtime, and significantly improves the execution efficiency of JavaScript.

Python is more suitable for data science and automation, while JavaScript is more suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 1. Python performs well in data science and machine learning, using libraries such as NumPy and Pandas for data processing and modeling. 2. Python is concise and efficient in automation and scripting. 3. JavaScript is indispensable in front-end development and is used to build dynamic web pages and single-page applications. 4. JavaScript plays a role in back-end development through Node.js and supports full-stack development.
