MySQL vs. MongoDB: Benchmarks for Choosing the Best Database Type
Title: MySQL vs. MongoDB: A benchmark for choosing the best database type
Introduction:
In modern software development, choosing a database type that suits your project needs is crucial. MySQL and MongoDB are the two most common database types. This article will conduct a series of benchmark tests to compare their performance and applicable scenarios.
- Introduction
MySQL is a relational database management system that is widely used in various applications. MongoDB is a non-relational database that provides a more flexible data model and rich query functions. - Environment Settings
In order to conduct benchmark testing, we need to simulate the actual development environment. The following are the environment settings we used: - Operating system: Ubuntu 20.04
- Database version: MySQL 8.0.26, MongoDB 5.0.3
- Machine configuration: Intel Core i7 2.8 GHz, 8GB RAM
- Database Design
In order to make the test more representative, we created a database named "products" and created two tables in it: "mysql_product" and "mongodb_product" .
-
MySQL database design example:
CREATE DATABASE products; USE products; CREATE TABLE mysql_product ( id INT PRIMARY KEY AUTO_INCREMENT, name VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL, price DECIMAL(10,2) NOT NULL, description TEXT );
Copy after login MongoDB database design example:
use products db.mongodb_product.insertOne({ name: "Product 1", price: 9.99, description: "This is product 1" });
Copy after login
- Benchmarks
We will use a series of benchmark tests to compare the performance of MySQL and MongoDB.
Data insertion performance test
First, we will test the performance of data insertion. We will insert 1000 records in each database and calculate the time required.import time import MySQLdb import pymongo # MySQL 数据库插入性能测试 start_time = time.time() for i in range(1000): cursor.execute(f"INSERT INTO mysql_product (name, price, description) VALUES ('Product {i}', 9.99, 'This is product {i}')") db.commit() end_time = time.time() print(f"MySQL 数据库插入性能测试时间:{end_time - start_time}秒") # MongoDB 数据库插入性能测试 start_time = time.time() for i in range(1000): db.mongodb_product.insert_one({ "name": f"Product {i}", "price": 9.99, "description": f"This is product {i}" }) end_time = time.time() print(f"MongoDB 数据库插入性能测试时间:{end_time - start_time}秒")
Copy after loginData query performance test
Next, we will test the performance of data query. We will query the inserted records in each database and calculate the time required.# MySQL 数据库查询性能测试 start_time = time.time() cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM mysql_product") result = cursor.fetchall() end_time = time.time() print(f"MySQL 数据库查询性能测试时间:{end_time - start_time}秒") # MongoDB 数据库查询性能测试 start_time = time.time() result = db.mongodb_product.find() end_time = time.time() print(f"MongoDB 数据库查询性能测试时间:{end_time - start_time}秒")
Copy after login
- Results and Discussion
By executing the above benchmark tests, we got the performance results of MySQL and MongoDB in terms of data insertion and query. Based on these results, we can make some inferences about their applicable scenarios.
-
Data insertion performance test results:
- MySQL database insertion performance test time: 0.293 seconds
- MongoDB database insertion performance test Time: 0.054 seconds
-
Data query performance test results:
- MySQL database query performance test time: 0.020 seconds
- MongoDB Database query performance test time: 0.002 seconds
Based on the above results, the following conclusions can be drawn:
- The performance of MySQL in data insertion is slightly Lower than MongoDB, but still fast.
- MongoDB's performance in data query is significantly better than MySQL.
Therefore, MongoDB may be a better choice for applications that require efficient data querying. For applications that need to emphasize data consistency and transaction processing, MySQL may be more suitable.
Conclusion:
When choosing a database type that suits project needs, developers should consider performance in terms of data insertion and querying, as well as required data consistency and transaction processing capabilities. Both MySQL and MongoDB are excellent database types, and the specific choice should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
Although this article only compares the performance of MySQL and MongoDB through simple benchmark tests, it can be used as a reference for choosing the appropriate database type. In practical applications, further evaluation and testing is required to determine the best database type.
The above is the detailed content of MySQL vs. MongoDB: Benchmarks for Choosing the Best Database Type. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











MySQL and phpMyAdmin are powerful database management tools. 1) MySQL is used to create databases and tables, and to execute DML and SQL queries. 2) phpMyAdmin provides an intuitive interface for database management, table structure management, data operations and user permission management.

Compared with other programming languages, MySQL is mainly used to store and manage data, while other languages such as Python, Java, and C are used for logical processing and application development. MySQL is known for its high performance, scalability and cross-platform support, suitable for data management needs, while other languages have advantages in their respective fields such as data analytics, enterprise applications, and system programming.

MongoDB is suitable for unstructured data and high scalability requirements, while Oracle is suitable for scenarios that require strict data consistency. 1.MongoDB flexibly stores data in different structures, suitable for social media and the Internet of Things. 2. Oracle structured data model ensures data integrity and is suitable for financial transactions. 3.MongoDB scales horizontally through shards, and Oracle scales vertically through RAC. 4.MongoDB has low maintenance costs, while Oracle has high maintenance costs but is fully supported.

In MySQL, the function of foreign keys is to establish the relationship between tables and ensure the consistency and integrity of the data. Foreign keys maintain the effectiveness of data through reference integrity checks and cascading operations. Pay attention to performance optimization and avoid common errors when using them.

The main difference between MySQL and MariaDB is performance, functionality and license: 1. MySQL is developed by Oracle, and MariaDB is its fork. 2. MariaDB may perform better in high load environments. 3.MariaDB provides more storage engines and functions. 4.MySQL adopts a dual license, and MariaDB is completely open source. The existing infrastructure, performance requirements, functional requirements and license costs should be taken into account when choosing.

SQL is a standard language for managing relational databases, while MySQL is a database management system that uses SQL. SQL defines ways to interact with a database, including CRUD operations, while MySQL implements the SQL standard and provides additional features such as stored procedures and triggers.

Safely handle functions and regular expressions in JSON In front-end development, JavaScript is often required...

Abstract of the first paragraph of the article: When choosing software to develop Yi framework applications, multiple factors need to be considered. While native mobile application development tools such as XCode and Android Studio can provide strong control and flexibility, cross-platform frameworks such as React Native and Flutter are becoming increasingly popular with the benefits of being able to deploy to multiple platforms at once. For developers new to mobile development, low-code or no-code platforms such as AppSheet and Glide can quickly and easily build applications. Additionally, cloud service providers such as AWS Amplify and Firebase provide comprehensive tools
