Golang intercepts Chinese garbled characters
When using Golang to intercept strings, you may encounter the problem of intercepting Chinese characters, resulting in garbled output. This phenomenon occurs because of Chinese character encoding problems.
Golang uses UTF-8 encoding to represent characters, and a Chinese character consists of three bytes under UTF-8 encoding. Therefore, if you do not pay attention to encoding issues, some unexpected problems will occur when intercepting strings, such as garbled output, incomplete string interception, etc.
The following are some methods to solve the problem of intercepting garbled Chinese characters.
Method 1: Use rune
Rune in Golang represents a Unicode character. If we want to intercept Chinese characters, we can first convert the string to rune type, then intercept the required characters, and finally convert the rune type to string.
Sample code:
package main import ( "fmt" ) func main() { str := "Go语言中文网" strRune := []rune(str) fmt.Println(string(strRune[0:2])) }
The output result is: Go
The above code first converts the string str to rune type, and then uses string slicing to intercept the first two characters, and finally convert the rune type to string output. Since one Chinese character occupies three bytes, we must choose the correct range when intercepting, otherwise garbled characters will appear.
Method 2: Use the Chinese character length instead of the number of bytes
Since one Chinese character in Golang occupies three bytes, we can use the Chinese character length as the standard when intercepting Chinese characters , rather than in bytes. This method can avoid the problem of garbled characters due to insufficient bytes.
Sample code:
package main import ( "fmt" "unicode/utf8" ) func main() { s := "Go语言中文网" var size int for i := range s { if size < 2 { size++ continue } fmt.Println(s[0:i]) break } fmt.Println("中文字符数量:", utf8.RuneCountInString(s)) }
The output result is: Go language
This code first uses the RuneCountInString() function in the utf8 library to calculate the number of Chinese characters in the string, Then slice and intercept the appropriate characters according to the length of the Chinese characters.
It should be noted that due to different character encodings, the number of bytes occupied by a Chinese character in different languages may also be different, so we should choose an appropriate method to intercept strings according to the specific situation.
To sum up, we can use rune type or Chinese character length to intercept strings, which can effectively avoid the problem of garbled Chinese characters. Of course, in practical applications, many situations need to be considered to achieve the best results.
The above is the detailed content of Golang intercepts Chinese garbled characters. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.
