The concept of closure in js
Closures are not unique to JavaScript, most high-level languages have this capability.
What is closure?
A closure is the combination of a function bundled together (enclosed) with references to its surrounding state (the lexical environment).
This Segment is the definition of closure on MDN, which is understood as: a function and its surrounding references in the closed lexical environment constitute a closure. Maybe this sentence is still difficult to understand. Take a look at the example:
function createAction() { var message = "封闭环境内的变量"; return function() { console.log(message); } } const showMessage = createAction(); showMessage(); // output: 封闭环境内的变量
This example is a typical closure. There are several points to note:
-
showMessage
is afunction
returned from createAction after execution. -
createAction
is a closed lexical environment internally.message
is a variable within the encapsulated environment and cannot be directly accessed from the outside. -
showMessage
is executed outsidecreateAction
, but during execution it accesses its internally defined local variablemessage
(successful output). This is because the function referenced byshowMessage
(the anonymous function insidecreateAction
) is bound to the lexical environment (insidecreateAction
) when it is defined. References (message
, etc.). - The anonymous function bound to the internal syntax environment is
return
brought tocreateAction
for use outside the closed environment, which forms a closure. If it is called insidecreateAction
, it is not considered a closure.
Okay, I believe 1, 2, and 4 are all easy to understand, but it may be a little difficult to understand the most important point 3 - the difficulty is that this is not something that programmers can decide. It is determined by language characteristics. So don't think that "you" created the closure, because closure is a language feature, you just took advantage of this feature.
If the language does not support closures, similar to the above code, when executing showMessage
, the message
variable will not be found. I particularly want to find an example, but unfortunately, all high-level languages I know seem to support closures as long as functions can be defined within functions/methods.
"Bring" locally defined functions out
We mentioned earlier that we can bring out locally defined functions through return
. Is there anything else besides this? Method?
The function has become a "good" here, no different from other goods (variables). As long as there is a way to take variables out, there is a way to take functions out. For example, using a "container" object:
function encase(aCase) { const dog = "狗狗"; const cat = "猫猫"; aCase.show = function () { console.log(dog, cat); }; } const myCase = {}; encase(myCase); myCase.show(); // output: 猫猫 狗狗
Are you inspired? Do you think of anything?
Modules and closures
Yes, exports and module.exports. In the module defined by CJS (CommonJS), you can bring goods one by one through exports.something
, or you can package goods through module.exports = ...
, but no matter what , exports
is the one that brings the goods, but it may be the exports
originally arranged, or it may be replaced by one of your own exports
.
ESM (ECMAScript Module) uses the import
and export
syntax, which is just another way to bring goods out, and return
Bringing goods is similar, the only difference is that return
can only bring one (unless packed), export
can bring a bunch.
It should be added that whether it is CJS or ESM, the module is an encapsulated environment, and the things defined in it cannot be accessed outside as long as they are not taken out. This is different from the default global environment of web scripts, so pay attention to the difference.
If expressed in code, I probably thought it was like this when defining the module:
const var1 = "我是一个顶层变量吧"; function maybeATopFunction() { }
The result is that in the running environment, it actually looks like this (note: only for illustration):
// module factory function createModule_18abk2(exports, module) { const var1 = "我是一个顶层变量吧"; function maybeATopFunction() { } } // ... 遥远的生产线上,有这样的示意代码 const module = { exports: {} }; const m18abk2 = createModule_18abk2(module) ?? module; // 想明白 createModule_18abk2 为什么会有一个随机后缀没?
Is it still the same function?
I went too far, but I brought it back. Think about a question: Theoretically, a function is a static code block. Is the closure function returned by calling the outer function multiple times the same one?
Try:
function create() { function closure() { } return closure; } const a = create(); const b = create(); console.log(a === b); // false
If you feel surprised, then define closure()
in another way to see if it will be easier to understand:
function create() { closure = function() { } return closure; }
If you still can’t understand it, look at this again:
function create() { const a = function () { }; const b = function () { }; console.log(a === b); // false }
Do you understand it? A new function is defined every time function
. The function is new, and the name is not important - you can call it Xiao Ming, but others can also call it Xiao Ming.
So, to summarize:
A closure is composed of a function and various resources (references) in the closed environment where it is defined. Each closure obtained They are all unique because the environmental resources that constitute the closure are different (different local environments, different local variables defined, different parameters passed in, etc.).
Closure, I figured it out this time!
Recommended tutorial: "JS Tutorial"
The above is the detailed content of The concept of closure in js. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











In C++, a closure is a lambda expression that can access external variables. To create a closure, capture the outer variable in the lambda expression. Closures provide advantages such as reusability, information hiding, and delayed evaluation. They are useful in real-world situations such as event handlers, where the closure can still access the outer variables even if they are destroyed.

A closure is a nested function that can access variables in the scope of the outer function. Its advantages include data encapsulation, state retention, and flexibility. Disadvantages include memory consumption, performance impact, and debugging complexity. Additionally, closures can create anonymous functions and pass them to other functions as callbacks or arguments.

C++ Lambda expressions support closures, which save function scope variables and make them accessible to functions. The syntax is [capture-list](parameters)->return-type{function-body}. capture-list defines the variables to capture. You can use [=] to capture all local variables by value, [&] to capture all local variables by reference, or [variable1, variable2,...] to capture specific variables. Lambda expressions can only access captured variables but cannot modify the original value.

Title: Memory leaks caused by closures and solutions Introduction: Closures are a very common concept in JavaScript, which allow internal functions to access variables of external functions. However, closures can cause memory leaks if used incorrectly. This article will explore the memory leak problem caused by closures and provide solutions and specific code examples. 1. Memory leaks caused by closures The characteristic of closures is that internal functions can access variables of external functions, which means that variables referenced in closures will not be garbage collected. If used improperly,

The impact of function pointers and closures on Go performance is as follows: Function pointers: Slightly slower than direct calls, but improves readability and reusability. Closures: Typically slower, but encapsulate data and behavior. Practical case: Function pointers can optimize sorting algorithms, and closures can create event handlers, but they will bring performance losses.

Yes, code simplicity and readability can be optimized through chained calls and closures: chained calls link function calls into a fluent interface. Closures create reusable blocks of code and access variables outside functions.

Go language function closures play a vital role in unit testing: Capturing values: Closures can access variables in the outer scope, allowing test parameters to be captured and reused in nested functions. Simplify test code: By capturing values, closures simplify test code by eliminating the need to repeatedly set parameters for each loop. Improve readability: Use closures to organize test logic, making test code clearer and easier to read.

Anonymous functions are concise and anonymous, but have poor readability and are difficult to debug; closures can encapsulate data and manage state, but may cause memory consumption and circular references. Practical case: Anonymous functions can be used for simple numerical processing, and closures can implement state management.
