


UI thread blocking problem caused by Jquery ajax synchronization blocking_jquery
Recently working on a project, I encountered a problem of UI thread blocking caused by synchronized ajax. Let me share my problem solving process with you.
The reason is this, because there are multiple similar asynchronous request actions on the page. In order to improve the reusability of the code, I encapsulated a function called getData, which receives different parameters and is only responsible for obtaining data. , and then return the data. The basic logic stripped out is as follows:
function getData1(){ var result; $.ajax({ url : "p.php", async : false, success: function(data){ result = data; } }); return result; }
The ajax here cannot be asynchronous, otherwise when the function returns, the result has not been assigned a value, and an error will occur. So I added async:false. There seems to be no problem. I can get the data normally by calling this function.
$(".btn1").click(function(){ var data = getData1(); alert(data); });
Next, I want to add another function. Since the ajax request is time-consuming, I need to have a loading effect on the page before sending the request, that is, displaying a "loading" gif image. I think everyone will also Saw it. So my processing function becomes like this:
$(".btn1").click(function(){ $(".loadingicon").show(); var data = getData1(); $(".loadingicon").hide(); alert(data); });
Show the loading image before requesting and hide it after the request is completed. There seems to be no problem. In order to see the effect clearly, my p.php code sleeps for 3 seconds, as follows:
<?php sleep(3); echo ("aaaaaa"); ?>
But a problem occurred when I ran it. When I clicked the button, the loading image did not appear as expected, and the page did not respond at all. After troubleshooting for a long time, I found the reason, which is async:false.
The browser's rendering (UI) thread and the js thread are mutually exclusive. When executing js time-consuming operations, page rendering will be blocked. There is no problem when we execute asynchronous ajax, but when set to a synchronous request, other actions (the code behind the ajax function, and the rendering thread) will stop. Even if my DOM operation statement is the sentence before the request is initiated, this synchronization request will "quickly" block the UI thread without giving it time to execute. This is why the code fails.
setTimeout solves blocking problem
Now that we understand what the problem is, let’s find a solution. In order to prevent the synchronous ajax request from blocking the thread, I thought of setTimeout, put the request code in sestTimeout, and let the browser restart a thread to operate. Wouldn't the problem be solved? Ever since, my code became like this:
$(".btn2").click(function(){ $(".loadingicon").show(); setTimeout(function(){ $.ajax({ url : "p.php", async : false, success: function(data){ $(".loadingicon").hide(); alert(data); } }); }, 0); });
The second parameter of setTimeout is set to 0, and the browser will execute it after a set minimum time. No matter what, let's run it first and see.
The result loading picture is displayed, but! ! ! Why doesn't the picture move? It's obviously an animated gif. At this time, I quickly thought that although the synchronization request was delayed, it would still block the UI thread during its execution. This blocking is so awesome that even the gif image doesn’t move and looks like a static image.
The conclusion is obvious. SetTimeout treats the symptoms but not the root cause. It is equivalent to making the synchronization request "slightly" asynchronous. Then it will still enter a synchronization nightmare and block the thread. The plan failed.
It’s time to use Deferred
jQuery introduced the Deferred object after version 1.5, which provides a very convenient generalized asynchronous mechanism. For details, please refer to this article by teacher Ruan Yifeng http://www.ruanyifeng.com/blog/2011/08/a_detailed_explanation_of_jquery_deferred_object.html.
So I rewrote the code using Deferred objects, as follows:
function getData3(){ var defer = $.Deferred(); $.ajax({ url : "p.php", //async : false, success: function(data){ defer.resolve(data) } }); return defer.promise(); } $(".btn3").click(function(){ $(".loadingicon").show(); $.when(getData3()).done(function(data){ $(".loadingicon").hide(); alert(data); }); });
You can see that I removed async:false in the ajax request, which means that the request is asynchronous again. Please also pay attention to this sentence in the success function: defer.resolve(data). The resolve method of the Deferred object can pass in a parameter of any type. This parameter can be obtained in the done method, so the data we requested asynchronously can be returned in this way.
At this point, the problem has been solved. Deferred objects are so powerful and convenient, we can take advantage of them.
All my test codes are as follows, interested students can use them to test:
<button class="btn1">async:false</button> <button class="btn2">setTimeout</button> <button class="btn3">deferred</button> <img class="loadingicon" style="position:fixed;left:50%;top:50%;margin-left:-16px;margin-top:-16px;display:none;" src=http://www.update8.com/Web/Jquery/"loading2.gif" alt="正在加载" /> <script> function getData1(){ var result; $.ajax({ url : "p.php", async : false, success: function(data){ result = data; } }); return result; } $(".btn1").click(function(){ $(".loadingicon").show(); var data = getData1(); $(".loadingicon").hide(); alert(data); }); $(".btn2").click(function(){ $(".loadingicon").show(); setTimeout(function(){ $.ajax({ url : "p.php", async : false, success: function(data){ $(".loadingicon").hide(); alert(data); } }); }, 0); }); function getData3(){ var defer = $.Deferred(); $.ajax({ url : "p.php", //async : false, success: function(data){ defer.resolve(data) } }); return defer.promise(); } $(".btn3").click(function(){ $(".loadingicon").show(); $.when(getData3()).done(function(data){ $(".loadingicon").hide(); alert(data); }); });</script>
ps:Parameter description of $.ajax
Parameter Description
url required. Specifies the URL to which the request should be sent.
data is optional. Map or string value. Specifies the data to be sent to the server with the request.
success(data, textStatus, jqXHR) Optional. The callback function executed when the request is successful.
dataType
Optional. Specifies the data type of the expected server response.
Intelligent judgment is performed by default (xml, json, script or html).

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Different JavaScript engines have different effects when parsing and executing JavaScript code, because the implementation principles and optimization strategies of each engine differ. 1. Lexical analysis: convert source code into lexical unit. 2. Grammar analysis: Generate an abstract syntax tree. 3. Optimization and compilation: Generate machine code through the JIT compiler. 4. Execute: Run the machine code. V8 engine optimizes through instant compilation and hidden class, SpiderMonkey uses a type inference system, resulting in different performance performance on the same code.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.

JavaScript's application in the real world includes front-end and back-end development. 1) Display front-end applications by building a TODO list application, involving DOM operations and event processing. 2) Build RESTfulAPI through Node.js and Express to demonstrate back-end applications.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

Both Python and JavaScript's choices in development environments are important. 1) Python's development environment includes PyCharm, JupyterNotebook and Anaconda, which are suitable for data science and rapid prototyping. 2) The development environment of JavaScript includes Node.js, VSCode and Webpack, which are suitable for front-end and back-end development. Choosing the right tools according to project needs can improve development efficiency and project success rate.
