Web Front-end
JS Tutorial
The reason why jQuery's Each is much slower than JS's native for loop
The reason why jQuery's Each is much slower than JS's native for loop
In fact, looking at the source code of jQuery, I found that the code of each is very simple, but why is the performance different from the native for loop by dozens of times?
jQuery's core code of each
for (; i < length; i++) {
value = callback.call(obj[i], i, obj[i]);
if (value === false) {
break;
}
}Looks very simple, but why is it so much slower?
Write the test code as follows:
var length=300000;
function GetArr() {
var t = [];
for (var i = 0; i < length; i++) {
t[i] = i;
}
return t;
}
function each1(obj, callback) {
var i = 0;
var length = obj.length
for (; i < length; i++) {
value = callback(i, obj[i]);
/* if ( value === false ) {去掉了判断
break;
}*/
}
}
function each2(obj, callback) {
var i = 0;
var length = obj.length
for (; i < length; i++) {
value = callback(i, obj[i]);/*去掉了call*/
if (value === false) {
break;
}
}
}
function each3(obj, callback) {
var i = 0;
var length = obj.length
for (; i < length; i++) {
value = callback.call(obj[i], i, obj[i]);/*自己写的call*/
if (value === false) {
break;
}
}
}
function Test1() {
var t = GetArr();
var date1 = new Date().getTime();
var lengtharr = t.length;
var total = 0;
each1(t, function (i, n) {
total += n;
});
var date12 = new Date().getTime();
console.log("1Test" + ((date12 - date1)));
}
function Test2() {
var t = GetArr();
var date1 = new Date().getTime();
var total = 0;
each2(t, function (i, n) {
total += n;
});
var date12 = new Date().getTime();
console.log("2Test" + ((date12 - date1)));
}
function Test3() {
var t = GetArr();
var date1 = new Date().getTime();
var total = 0;
each3(t, function (i, n) {
total += n;
});
var date12 = new Date().getTime();
console.log("3Test" + ((date12 - date1)));
}
function Test4() {
var t = GetArr();
var date1 = new Date().getTime();
var total = 0;
$.each(t, function (i, n) {
total += n;
});
var date12 = new Date().getTime();
console.log("4Test" + ((date12 - date1)));
}Run the test and find that the difference between the first and second is not very big, which shows that the performance difference caused by the break judgment is very small, but the first The deviation between the second and third, and the fourth is more than double, and the only difference between the second and the third is that call is called. It seems that call will cause performance loss, because call will switch context. Of course, jQuery There are other reasons why each is slow. It also calls other methods in the loop, and call is just one reason.
Therefore, it can be said that call and apply are relatively performance-consuming methods in js. When performance requirements are strict, it is recommended to use them sparingly.
Let’s look at the performance comparison between jquery’s each and js native for loop through a piece of code
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head runat="server">
<title>for与each性能比较</title>
<script src="../Cks/jquery-1.7.1.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript">
function getSelectLength() {
var time1 = new Date().getTime();
var len = $("#select_test").find("option").length;
var selectObj = $("#select_test");
for (var i = 0; i < len; i++) {
if (selectObj.get(0).options[i].text == "111111") {
selectObj.get(0).options[i].selected = true;
break;
}
}
var time2 = new Date().getTime();
alert("for循环执行时间：" + (time2 - time1));
time1 = new Date().getTime();
$("#select_test").find("option").each(function () {
if ($(this).text() == "111111") {
$(this)[0].selected = true;
}
});
time2 = new Date().getTime();
alert("each循环执行时间：" + (time2 - time1));
}
</script>
</head>
<body>
<form id="form1" runat="server">
<div><select id="select_test">
<option value='1'>111111</option>
<option value='2'>222222</option>
<option value='3'>333333</option>
<option value='4'>444444</option>
<option value='5'>5</option>
<option value='6'>6</option>
<option value='7'>7</option>
<option value='8'>8</option>
<option value='9'>9</option>
<option value='10'>10</option>
<option value='11'>11</option>
<option value='12'>12</option>
<option value='13'>13</option>
<option value='14'>14</option>
<option value='15'>15</option>
<option value='16'>16</option>
<option value='17'>17</option>
<option value='18'>18</option>
<option value='19'>19</option>
<option value='20'>20</option>
</select><input type="button" value="开始比较" onclick="getSelectLength();" /></div>
<div>
</form>
</body>
</html>Input discrepancy:
for loop execution time: 1
each loop execution time: 3
The two results directly illustrate the problem.
The above is the reason why the jQuery Each is much slower than the JS native for loop performance introduced by the editor. I hope it will be helpful to you. If you have any questions, please leave me a message and the editor will Reply to everyone promptly. I would also like to thank you all for your support of the PHP Chinese website!
For more related articles on why jQuery's Each is much slower than JS's native for loop, please pay attention to the PHP Chinese website!
Hot AI Tools
Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos
AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.
Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free
Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover
Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!
Hot Article
Hot Tools
Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor
SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use
Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment
Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools
SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)
Hot Topics
1664
14
1423
52
1317
25
1268
29
1245
24
The Evolution of JavaScript: Current Trends and Future Prospects
Apr 10, 2025 am 09:33 AM
The latest trends in JavaScript include the rise of TypeScript, the popularity of modern frameworks and libraries, and the application of WebAssembly. Future prospects cover more powerful type systems, the development of server-side JavaScript, the expansion of artificial intelligence and machine learning, and the potential of IoT and edge computing.
JavaScript Engines: Comparing Implementations
Apr 13, 2025 am 12:05 AM
Different JavaScript engines have different effects when parsing and executing JavaScript code, because the implementation principles and optimization strategies of each engine differ. 1. Lexical analysis: convert source code into lexical unit. 2. Grammar analysis: Generate an abstract syntax tree. 3. Optimization and compilation: Generate machine code through the JIT compiler. 4. Execute: Run the machine code. V8 engine optimizes through instant compilation and hidden class, SpiderMonkey uses a type inference system, resulting in different performance performance on the same code.
Python vs. JavaScript: The Learning Curve and Ease of Use
Apr 16, 2025 am 12:12 AM
Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.
JavaScript: Exploring the Versatility of a Web Language
Apr 11, 2025 am 12:01 AM
JavaScript is the core language of modern web development and is widely used for its diversity and flexibility. 1) Front-end development: build dynamic web pages and single-page applications through DOM operations and modern frameworks (such as React, Vue.js, Angular). 2) Server-side development: Node.js uses a non-blocking I/O model to handle high concurrency and real-time applications. 3) Mobile and desktop application development: cross-platform development is realized through ReactNative and Electron to improve development efficiency.
How to Build a Multi-Tenant SaaS Application with Next.js (Frontend Integration)
Apr 11, 2025 am 08:22 AM
This article demonstrates frontend integration with a backend secured by Permit, building a functional EdTech SaaS application using Next.js. The frontend fetches user permissions to control UI visibility and ensures API requests adhere to role-base
Building a Multi-Tenant SaaS Application with Next.js (Backend Integration)
Apr 11, 2025 am 08:23 AM
I built a functional multi-tenant SaaS application (an EdTech app) with your everyday tech tool and you can do the same. First, what’s a multi-tenant SaaS application? Multi-tenant SaaS applications let you serve multiple customers from a sing
From C/C to JavaScript: How It All Works
Apr 14, 2025 am 12:05 AM
The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.
JavaScript and the Web: Core Functionality and Use Cases
Apr 18, 2025 am 12:19 AM
The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.
