Improvements in JavaScript DOM operations
As a web front-end, dealing with and understanding browser differences is an important issue. Below I will introduce a summary of some of my notes at work. First, I will introduce the situation without using a js library.
1. The setAttribute method sets the element class name: In jQuery, you can directly use the attr() method, which can be used in native JS
element.setAttribute(class, newClassName) //This is the W3C standard and is compatible with It is valid in W3C standard browsers. However, IE is the main theme for domestic users.
element.setAttribute(className, newClassName) //Such a setting is only valid in IE.
element.className = newClassName //All browsers are valid (as long as Support javascript)
Okay, that’s the beginning. The purpose of this article is to introduce the differences between browsers and let front-end friends understand how to use the most effective method to solve the problem. Let’s continue.
2. FireFox does not have a window.event object, only an event object. IE only supports window.event, while other mainstream browsers support both, so it is generally written as:
function handle(e)
{
e = e || event;
...
}
3. Principle of DOMContentLoaded event: The window.onload event is triggered after the page parsing/DOM tree establishment is completed and the downloading of all resources such as pictures, scripts, style sheets, etc. of. This is a bit too "late" for many practical applications, which affects the user experience. In order to solve this problem, a DOMContentLoaded method was added to FF. Compared with onload, this method is triggered earlier. It is triggered after the DOM content of the page is loaded without waiting for other resources to be loaded (this is also This is the implementation principle of jquery.ready() event).
//The following is the original analysis of jQuery 1.4.2 version
bindReady: function() {
if ( readyBound ) {
return;
}
readyBound = true;
// Catch cases where $(document).ready () is called after the
// browser event has already occurred.
if ( document.readyState === "complete" ) {
return jQuery.ready();
}
// Mozilla, Opera and webkit nightlies currently support this event
if ( document.addEventListener ) {
// Use the handy event callback
document.addEventListener( "DOMContentLoaded", DOMContentLoaded, false );
// A fallback to window.onload, that will always work
window.addEventListener ( "load", jQuery.ready, false );
// If IE event model is used
} else if ( document.attachEvent ) {
// ensure firing before onload,
// maybe late but safe also for iframes
document.attachEvent("onreadystatechange", DOMContentLoaded);
// A fallback to window.onload, that will always work
window.attachEvent( "onload", jQuery.ready );
// If IE and not a frame
/ /continuously check to see if the document is ready
var toplevel = false;
try {
toplevel = window.frameElement == null;
} catch(e) {}
if ( document.documentElement.doScroll && toplevel ) {
doScrollCheck();
}
}
}
Design idea - Treat Webkit and Firefox equally, and both directly register the DOMContentLoaded event. However, since Webkit was only introduced in version 525 or above, there are hidden dangers of compatibility. For IE, first register the onreadystatechange event of the document. After testing, this method is equivalent to window.onload. It will still wait until all resources are downloaded before triggering. After that, if it is determined that it is IE and the page is not in an iframe, the doScroll method of documentElement is continuously called through setTiemout until the call is successful and DOMContentLoaded is triggered. 1 The principle of jQuery's solution to IE is that under IE, some methods of DOM can only be called after the DOM parsing is completed. doScroll is such a method. In turn, when doScroll can be called, the DOM parsing is completed. Compared with document.write in prototype, this solution can solve the problem of failure when the page has an iframe. In addition, jQuery seems to be worried that this method will fail when the page is in an iframe, so it makes a judgment in the implementation code. If it is in an iframe, it is implemented through the onreadystatechange of the document, otherwise it is implemented through doScroll. However, after testing, doScroll still works even in an iframe.
4. Learn to use IE’s conditional comments. Many front-ends are always complaining about the evil IE. Indeed, dealing with compatibility issues will indeed become more and more disgusting, but there is no way. Since there is no way to change, then please enjoy...
Version 6
Let’s summarize it here for today. I will have time to post an advanced AJAX article when I get back from vacation next week. I hope it can be helpful to novices or people in need. Due to the limited writing style, please forgive me if the writing is not good. I have just started blogging and it is in the growth stage. Haha...

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Different JavaScript engines have different effects when parsing and executing JavaScript code, because the implementation principles and optimization strategies of each engine differ. 1. Lexical analysis: convert source code into lexical unit. 2. Grammar analysis: Generate an abstract syntax tree. 3. Optimization and compilation: Generate machine code through the JIT compiler. 4. Execute: Run the machine code. V8 engine optimizes through instant compilation and hidden class, SpiderMonkey uses a type inference system, resulting in different performance performance on the same code.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.

JavaScript's application in the real world includes front-end and back-end development. 1) Display front-end applications by building a TODO list application, involving DOM operations and event processing. 2) Build RESTfulAPI through Node.js and Express to demonstrate back-end applications.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

Both Python and JavaScript's choices in development environments are important. 1) Python's development environment includes PyCharm, JupyterNotebook and Anaconda, which are suitable for data science and rapid prototyping. 2) The development environment of JavaScript includes Node.js, VSCode and Webpack, which are suitable for front-end and back-end development. Choosing the right tools according to project needs can improve development efficiency and project success rate.
