


Let's talk about javascript image preloading technology again (detailed demonstration)_javascript skills
The preloading technology mentioned in this article mainly allows JavaScript to quickly obtain the size of the image header data.
A typical example of using preloading to obtain the image size:
var imgLoad = function (url, callback) {
var img = new Image();
img.src = url;
if (img.complete) {
callback (img.width, img.height);
} else {
img.onload = function () {
callback(img.width, img.height);
img.onload = null;
};
};
};
You can see that using onload requires waiting for the image to be loaded, and its speed cannot be complimented.
Web applications are different from desktop applications, and response speed is the best user experience. If you want both speed and elegance, you must obtain the image size in advance. How can you obtain the image size before the image is loaded?
More than ten years of Internet experience tells me: when the browser loads images, you will see that the images will first occupy a piece of land and then slowly load, and most of the images here do not have preset width and height. Attribute, because the browser can obtain the header data of the image. Based on this, you only need to use javascript to regularly detect the size status of the image to know the image size ready status.
Implementation code (updated on 2011-03-11):
2011-03-12 updated:
Only use a certain timer to optimize performance
/*!
* img ready v0.3
* http://www .planeart.cn/?p=1121
* TangBin - MIT Licensed
*/
// Image header data loading ready event
// @param {String} image path
// @param {Function} The callback function for getting the size (parameter 1 receives width; parameter 2 receives height)
// @param {Function} The callback function for loading errors (optional)
(function () {
var list = [], intervalId = null,
tick = function () {
var i = 0;
for (; i < list.length; i ) {
list[i ].end ? list.splice(i--, 1) : list[i]();
};
!list.length && stop();
},
stop = function () {
clearInterval(intervalId);
intervalId = null;
};
this.imgReady = function (url, callback, error) {
var check, end, width, height , offsetWidth, offsetHeight, div,
accuracy = 1024,
doc = document,
container = doc.body || doc.getElementsByTagName('head')[0],
img = new Image ();
img.src = url;
if (!callback) return img;
// If the image is cached, return the cached data directly
if (img.complete) return callback( img.width, img.height);
// Insert a secret image into the page to monitor whether the image takes up space
div = doc.createElement('div');
div.style.cssText = 'visibility:hidden;position:absolute;left:0;top:0;width:1px;height:1px;overflow:hidden';
div.appendChild(img)
container.appendChild(div);
width = img.offsetWidth;
height = img.offsetHeight;
// Completely loaded event
img.onload = function () {
end();
callback( img.width, img.height);
};
// Event after loading error
img.onerror = function () {
end();
error && error() ;
};
// Check whether the image has been occupied
check = function () {
offsetWidth = img.offsetWidth;
offsetHeight = img.offsetHeight;
if (offsetWidth !== width || offsetHeight !== height || offsetWidth * offsetHeight > accuracy) {
end();
callback(offsetWidth, offsetHeight);
};
};
check.url = url;
// Clean up after the operation is completed
// Delete elements and events to avoid IE memory leaks
end = function () {
check.end = true;
img.onload = img.onerror = null;
div.innerHTML = '';
div.parentNode.removeChild(div);
};
// Will detect whether the image is a placeholder The function is added to the timer queue for regular execution
// Only one detector is added to the same picture
// Only one timer is allowed to appear at any time to reduce browser performance loss
!check.end && check( );
for (var i = 0; i < list.length; i ) {
if (list[i].url === url) return;
};
if ( !check.end) {
list.push(check);
if (!intervalId) intervalId = setInterval(tick, 150);
};
};
})() ;
Isn’t it very simple? The speed of obtaining photographic-level photo sizes in this way is often dozens of times that of the onload method, and it can achieve a flash sale effect for ordinary web browsing-level pictures (within 800×600).
Okay, please watch the delightful DEMO: http://demo.jb51.net/js/2011/imgready/
(Tested browsers: Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Opera, IE6, IE7, IE8)
From:: Tang Bin

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Different JavaScript engines have different effects when parsing and executing JavaScript code, because the implementation principles and optimization strategies of each engine differ. 1. Lexical analysis: convert source code into lexical unit. 2. Grammar analysis: Generate an abstract syntax tree. 3. Optimization and compilation: Generate machine code through the JIT compiler. 4. Execute: Run the machine code. V8 engine optimizes through instant compilation and hidden class, SpiderMonkey uses a type inference system, resulting in different performance performance on the same code.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.

JavaScript's application in the real world includes front-end and back-end development. 1) Display front-end applications by building a TODO list application, involving DOM operations and event processing. 2) Build RESTfulAPI through Node.js and Express to demonstrate back-end applications.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

Both Python and JavaScript's choices in development environments are important. 1) Python's development environment includes PyCharm, JupyterNotebook and Anaconda, which are suitable for data science and rapid prototyping. 2) The development environment of JavaScript includes Node.js, VSCode and Webpack, which are suitable for front-end and back-end development. Choosing the right tools according to project needs can improve development efficiency and project success rate.
