JS function to dynamically add CSS style sheet files_Basic knowledge
Give the function first.
varaddSheet=function(){
vardoc,cssCode ;
if(arguments.length==1){
doc=document;
cssCode=arguments[0]
}elseif(arguments.length==2){
doc=arguments [0];
cssCode=arguments[1];
}else{
alert("addSheet function accepts up to two parameters!");
}
if(! "v1" ){//Add the automatic conversion transparency function. Users only need to enter the W3C transparent style, and it will automatically be converted into IE's transparent filter
vart=cssCode.match(/opacity:(d?.d );/) ;
if(t!=null){
cssCode=cssCode.replace(t[0],"filter:alpha(opacity=" parseFloat(t[1])*100 ")")
}
}
cssCode=cssCode " ";//Add a newline character at the end to facilitate viewing under firebug.
varheadElement=doc.getElementsByTagName("head")[0];
varstyleElements=headElement.getElementsByTagName("style");
if(styleElements.length==0){//If style does not exist Element is created
if(doc.createStyleSheet){//ie
doc.createStyleSheet();
}else{
vartempStyleElement=doc.createElement('style');//w3c
tempStyleElement.setAttribute("type","text/css");
headElement.appendChild(tempStyleElement);
}
}
varstyleElement=styleElements[0];
varmedia=styleElement .getAttribute("media");
if(media!=null&&!/screen/.test(media.toLowerCase())){
styleElement.setAttribute("media","screen");
}
if(styleElement.styleSheet){//ie
styleElement.styleSheet.cssText =cssCode;
}elseif(doc.getBoxObjectFor){
styleElement.innerHTML =cssCode;//Firefox support Add the style sheet string directly to innerHTML
}else{
styleElement.appendChild(doc.createTextNode(cssCode))
}
}
Sometimes we need to add .js The file dynamically introduces some CSS styles to the document. For some short CSS codes, this is easy to handle. We can call its style method, such as
varddd=document.getElementById("ddd");
ddd.style.border="1pxsolidred";
It doesn’t matter if it’s longer:
varddd=document.getElementById("ddd");
ddd.style.cssText="border:1pxsolidred;color:#000;background:#444;float:left";
Personally, I like the latter. Because the former has serious compatibility issues. For example, the float style is styleFloat in IE, and cssFloat in W3C standard browsers such as Firefox. And cssText is universal.
If it is very long, we can dynamically import a CSS file. For example,
functionaddSheetFile(path){
varfileref=document .createElement("link")
fileref.rel="stylesheet";
fileref.type="text/css";
fileref.href=path;
fileref.media="screen" ;
varheadobj=document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0];
headobj.appendChild(fileref);
}
This function is a bit cumbersome in IE. I have always used the native functions of whichever browser supports it, and using binary code directly is the most efficient.
varoStylesheet=document.createStyleSheet(sURL,iIndex);
The two parameters of createStyleSheet are optional.
But if our style is unique to a certain page and can only be used by administrators, and that part of the page is dynamically generated, do we need to introduce it from the beginning? Do I need to create a special file to load it? The best way is to have these styles bundled with dynamic scripts. This function was developed for this purpose.
Frankly speaking, it was originally developed for rich text editors. As we all know, the most popular way to use a rich text input box is to put the content to be entered into an iframe. This involves two types of documents, one is the document of the main page, and the other is the document of the iframe. The document of iframe also involves compatibility issues. We can:
variframe=document.createElement('iframe');//Generate richtexteditor for editing
variframeDocument=iframe.contentDocument||iframe.contentWindow.document;
......
Well , too far away. All in all, the initial judgment of the function is prepared for these two documents. If there is no iframe involved, we only need to pass in one parameter. The last parameter is always a CSS string.
Then there is the problem of dynamically generating the styleSheet element and adding the CSS string to this element. Of course, if there is one at the current stage, of course, use the ready-made one. The more DOM elements there are, the greater the burden on the browser. We think of the document.styleSheets method. It returns a collection, including style elements and link elements, and also involves a compatibility issue, such as:
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional. dtd">
<%# --By default, all links are opened in this window-%>
<%=stylesheet_link_tag"screen","button","style"%>
<%=javascript_tag"window._token='#{form_authenticity_token}'"ifActionController::Base .allow_forgery_protection%>
<%=javascript_include_tag:defaults%>
Use alert(document.styleSheets.length); to test it above. IE returns 6 and W3C browser returns 5. Therefore, it was rejected. And we only use the style element, not external links. The second part of the judgment is for the style element in the head. If it does not exist, create one. Then we just add the CSS string to the first style element.
Next we need to add a safety lock, because when media="print", the defined effect is only effective when the page is printed. In order to prevent the media value of the first style element from being different from screen, we have to change it.
styleElement.setAttribute("media","screen");
}
Attached are some instructions from the media.
screen (default value), submitted to the computer screen;
projection, submitted to the projector;
aural, speaker;
braille, submitted to the embossed character Tactile sensing devices;
tty, teletypewriter (using fixed fonts);
tv, television set;
all, all output devices.
The last question added is this. There are three types of browsers: IE, Firefox and other browsers. Determining browsers also uses their own private properties or methods. For example, styleSheet is used exclusively by IE, and getBoxObjectFor is used exclusively by Firefox (of course you can also use (/firefox/.test(navigator.userAgent.toLowerCase()))). Usually DOM operations are the most time-consuming. If you can use private Use private!
Usage method:
Copy code

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Different JavaScript engines have different effects when parsing and executing JavaScript code, because the implementation principles and optimization strategies of each engine differ. 1. Lexical analysis: convert source code into lexical unit. 2. Grammar analysis: Generate an abstract syntax tree. 3. Optimization and compilation: Generate machine code through the JIT compiler. 4. Execute: Run the machine code. V8 engine optimizes through instant compilation and hidden class, SpiderMonkey uses a type inference system, resulting in different performance performance on the same code.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.

JavaScript's application in the real world includes front-end and back-end development. 1) Display front-end applications by building a TODO list application, involving DOM operations and event processing. 2) Build RESTfulAPI through Node.js and Express to demonstrate back-end applications.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

Both Python and JavaScript's choices in development environments are important. 1) Python's development environment includes PyCharm, JupyterNotebook and Anaconda, which are suitable for data science and rapid prototyping. 2) The development environment of JavaScript includes Node.js, VSCode and Webpack, which are suitable for front-end and back-end development. Choosing the right tools according to project needs can improve development efficiency and project success rate.
