Explain the difference between Statement-Based Replication (SBR), Row-Based Replication (RBR), and Mixed-Based Replication (MBR).

There are three main ways of replication in MySQL: SBR, RBR and MBR. 1. SBR records SQL statements, which are suitable for standard operations, but may cause data inconsistency. 2. RBR records data changes to ensure consistency, but the log is large. 3.MBR combines the two and selects the method according to the SQL type, which is flexible but complex. Consistency, performance, and complexity are considered when choosing.

introduction

In the field of database replication, choosing the right replication method is crucial, which directly affects data consistency, performance, and system maintainability. Today we will explore three main MySQL replication methods: Statement-Based Replication (SBR), Row-Based Replication (RBR), and Mixed-Based Replication (MBR). Through this article, you will learn about the principles, advantages and disadvantages of each method, and the choice strategy in practical applications.

Review of basic knowledge

Before we get started, let's quickly review some of the basic concepts of MySQL replication. MySQL replication is a technology that replicates data from one MySQL database server (master server) to another or more MySQL database servers (slave servers). Replication can be used in various scenarios such as data backup, load balancing, and failover.

Core concept or function analysis

Statement-Based Replication (SBR)

The working principle of SBR is to record SQL statements executed on the master server into binary logs, then read these logs from the server and execute the same SQL statements to achieve data synchronization.

 -- SQL statement on the main server INSERT INTO users (name, email) VALUES ('John Doe', 'john@example.com');

The advantage of SBR is that the log file is smaller, because only the SQL statement itself is recorded. However, there are some challenges in SBR, such as some functions (such as NOW()) may produce different results on the master and slave server, resulting in inconsistent data.

Row-Based Replication (RBR)

RBR is different, it records changes in each row of data, not the SQL statement itself. This means that the slave server will accurately copy changes in data on the master server.

 -- Data changes on the main server INSERT INTO users VALUES (1, 'John Doe', 'john@example.com');

The advantage of RBR is that it can ensure data consistency because it records actual data changes, not SQL statements. However, RBR's log files are usually larger than SBR's because it requires recording changes in each line.

Mixed-Based Replication (MBR)

MBR combines the advantages of SBR and RBR, and it automatically chooses to use SBR or RBR according to the type of SQL statement. For example, for unsafe SQL statements (statements that may cause data inconsistencies), MBR will choose RBR.

 -- Select the copy method according to the type of SQL statement IF unsafe_statement THEN
    USE RBR;
ELSE
    USE SBR;
END IF;

The flexibility of MBR makes it the best choice in some scenarios, but also adds to the complexity of configuration and maintenance.

Example of usage

Basic usage of SBR

SBR is suitable for most standard SQL operations such as INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE.

 -- Execute UPDATE products on the main server SET price = price * 1.1 WHERE category = 'Electronics';

The slave server will execute the same SQL statement to ensure the consistency of the data.

Advanced usage of RBR

RBR performs well when dealing with complex triggers and stored procedures because it accurately records changes on each row.

 -- Execute CREATE TRIGGER update_inventory AFTER INSERT ON orders on the primary server
FOR EACH ROW
BEGIN
    UPDATE inventory SET quantity = quantity - NEW.quantity WHERE product_id = NEW.product_id;
END;

RBR will record each row of data changes after the trigger is executed to ensure that the data on the slave server is consistent with the master server.

Common Errors and Debugging Tips

• Inconsistent data in SBR : If nondeterministic functions (such as RAND()) are used, it may cause inconsistent data on the master and slave server. The solution is to avoid using these functions as much as possible, or switch to RBR.
• Log files in RBR are too large : RBR's log files may become very large, affecting performance. The log size can be optimized by adjusting the binlog_row_image parameter.

Performance optimization and best practices

When choosing a copy method, the following factors need to be considered:

• Data consistency : If data consistency is the primary consideration, RBR may be more suitable because it accurately records changes in each row.
• Performance : SBR usually performs better in log size and performance, especially when dealing with a lot of simple SQL operations.
• Complexity : MBR provides flexibility, but also increases configuration and maintenance complexity.

In practical applications, the appropriate copying method can be selected according to specific needs. For example, for an e-commerce platform, RBR may be more suitable because it ensures consistency in order data; while for a blog system, SBR may be more suitable because it provides better performance.

In short, choosing a suitable MySQL replication method requires comprehensive consideration of various factors such as data consistency, performance and system complexity. I hope this article can provide you with some valuable reference when choosing a copy method.

The above is the detailed content of Explain the difference between Statement-Based Replication (SBR), Row-Based Replication (RBR), and Mixed-Based Replication (MBR).. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!