


After introducing the istio service mesh, do I still need to use the go-micro microservice framework?
Service mesh and microservice framework: collaboration or replacement?
When building microservice architectures, service mesh technologies such as Istio and microservice frameworks such as go-micro and go-zero are often mentioned at the same time. There is partial overlap in their capabilities, such as service discovery, which raises the question: after Istio is introduced, are frameworks like go-micro still needed?
Service mesh like Istio focuses on managing communication and governance between microservices, providing service discovery, traffic control, monitoring and other functions. These functions may have been handled by frameworks such as go-micro. However, the introduction of Istio simplifies the way microservices are called, making them closer to the direct connection of single instances, and handing over complex tasks such as service governance, traffic management and monitoring to Istio, thereby reducing the burden on the microservice framework and making it more focused on business logic.
However, the service mesh is not the perfect solution. It increases the complexity of system operation and maintenance and may introduce network latency. Therefore, whether to adopt a service mesh needs to be weighed based on the actual business scenario. In addition, the service mesh has requirements for network protocols, and currently supports HTTP and gRPC, and the support for other protocols may be limited.
In summary, after introducing service mesh such as Istio, microservice frameworks such as go-micro can still be used, but the functional focus of the framework will change, mainly dealing with business logic, while service governance is the responsibility of the service mesh. The choice of which combination to use depends on the project's requirements and complexity.
The above is the detailed content of After introducing the istio service mesh, do I still need to use the go-micro microservice framework?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.
