Explain the difference between the * selector and the html selector.

Explain the difference between the * selector and the html selector.

The * selector and the html selector are both used in CSS to target elements, but they serve different purposes and have distinct behaviors.

The * selector, also known as the universal selector, targets all elements within a document. This means that any CSS rule applied using the * selector will affect every single element on the page, including HTML elements, pseudo-elements, and even elements within the section. For example, if you use * { margin: 0; padding: 0; }, you are applying these styles to every element on the page.

On the other hand, the html selector specifically targets the root element of the document. This selector is used to apply styles directly to the element, which can then be inherited by its child elements. For instance, html { font-size: 16px; } sets the base font size for the entire document, as the element is the parent of all other elements.

In summary, the * selector applies to all elements, whereas the html selector applies only to the root element.

What are the performance implications of using the * selector versus the html selector?

The performance implications of using the * selector versus the html selector can be significant, primarily due to the scope and specificity of each selector.

The * selector targets every element on the page, which means the browser has to apply the styles to a large number of elements. This can lead to slower rendering times, especially on complex pages with many elements. The universal nature of the * selector can also cause the browser to perform more work than necessary, as it has to check and apply the styles to elements that might not need them.

In contrast, the html selector targets only the root element. Since there is only one element per document, the browser has to apply the styles to just one element. This results in faster rendering times and less computational overhead compared to the * selector.

In terms of performance, it is generally more efficient to use the html selector when you need to apply styles that should affect the entire document, as it minimizes the number of elements the browser needs to process.

How does the specificity of the * selector compare to that of the html selector?

Specificity in CSS determines which styles are applied when multiple rules target the same element. Both the * selector and the html selector have low specificity, but they differ in their exact specificity values.

The * selector has the lowest possible specificity, with a value of 0,0,0,0. This means that any other selector, no matter how simple, will override styles applied by the * selector if they target the same element.

The html selector has a slightly higher specificity, with a value of 0,0,1,0. This is because it targets a specific element type (html), which gives it a higher specificity than the universal selector.

In practice, this means that if you have conflicting styles, the html selector will take precedence over the * selector. For example, if you have * { color: red; } and html { color: blue; }, the text color will be blue because the html selector has higher specificity.

In what scenarios would you choose to use the html selector over the * selector?

There are several scenarios where you might prefer to use the html selector over the * selector:

1. Setting Global Styles: If you want to set a base style that should be inherited by all elements, such as a base font size or a default background color, using the html selector is more appropriate. For example, html { font-size: 62.5%; } can be used to set a base font size that makes it easier to use rem units.
2. Performance Considerations: As mentioned earlier, the html selector is more performant because it targets only one element. If performance is a concern, especially on complex pages, using the html selector can help reduce rendering times.
3. Specificity Control: If you need to apply a style that should be easily overridden by other selectors, the html selector is a better choice. Its slightly higher specificity than the * selector makes it more suitable for setting default styles that can be easily overridden.
4. Semantic and Structural Clarity: Using the html selector can make your CSS more readable and maintainable, as it clearly indicates that the style is being applied to the root element of the document. This can be particularly useful in larger projects where clarity and organization are important.

In summary, the html selector is generally preferred over the * selector when setting global styles, optimizing performance, managing specificity, and maintaining semantic clarity in your CSS.

The above is the detailed content of Explain the difference between the * selector and the html selector.. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!