Web-Slinger.css: Across the Swiper-Verse
My previous post highlighted the irreversible consequences of horizontal swiping on Tinder. I'll delve into that frustration another time, but at first glance, swipe navigation seems perfect for Web-Slinger.css – my experimental, pure CSS alternative to Wow.js for one-way scroll-triggered animations. (Still working on the theme song!)
Can Web-Slinger.css handle a Tinder-style swipe interaction for liking/disliking elements using only CSS? And more importantly, will this justify using a Spider-Pig image, as per popular demand? Introducing the Spider-Pig swiper – my proposed captcha replacement (because who doesn't love Spider-Pig?). Swipe left or right below (Chrome/Edge only, for now) to register your opinion.
Expanding the Horizons
Web-Slinger.css, apparently, wasn't designed for horizontal scrolling. The fix? A simple CSS override:
[class^="scroll-trigger-"] { view-timeline-axis: x; }
This alters Web-Slinger's default behavior for elements with scroll-trigger-n
classes, making scroll triggers react to horizontal, not vertical, scrolling. Otherwise, triggers would activate immediately, despite being visually hidden due to container width, as they'd be above the vertical fold in our swiper.
My initial steps involved forking Nikolay Talanov's excellent JavaScript Tinder swipe demo, removing the JavaScript and all but one card, then importing Web-Slinger.css and applying the horizontal patch. The card container became position: fixed
, with three side-by-side, viewport-sized, scroll-snapping boxes. The middle slide used scroll-align: center
, starting the user in the center and allowing backward/forward scrolling.
Note: With unconventional scroll-driven animations, the scrollable element doesn't need to scroll anything visible. It's like checkbox hacks – hide the checkbox, style the label. We leverage the scrollable element's CSS behaviors, not its default UI.
A scroll-trigger-1
div on the third slide activated a rejection animation:
<div> </div> <main> <div></div> <div></div> <div><div></div></div> </main>
It worked! (Narrator: It didn't, really. More on that later.)
<div> <div></div> </div> <main> <div><div></div></div> <div></div> <div><div></div></div> </main>
Adding this resulted in Spider-Pig being automatically "liked" on page load. Perfect for someone universally adored... (ahem, a middle-aged CSS hacker). But Spider-Pig isn't universally loved, so let's examine why the right-swipe behaved differently than expected, despite seemingly identical principles.
Stepping Back
This bug highlighted view-timeline
's limitations. Web-Slinger relies on technology not ideally suited for animations triggered only by backward scrolling.
A visualizer shows that regardless of animation-range
, the animation completes after the element leaves the viewport in the scrolling direction – the opposite of our needs.
Fortunately, Bramus (Chrome Dev Team) has a demo for detecting scroll direction in CSS. Using his clever --scroll-direction
custom property, we can control the scroll-trigger-2
element's appearance with a style query:
[class^="scroll-trigger-"] { view-timeline-axis: x; }
This ensures .scroll-trigger-2
only appears when on the previous slide, reached via backward scrolling. --slide-index
(controlled by a three-second, three-step animation) counts the current slide, requiring a decisive swipe to trigger the dislike.
The Final Swipe
To track Spider-Pig opinions, I used a third-party counter image as a background:
<div> </div> <main> <div></div> <div></div> <div><div></div></div> </main>
Lessons Learned
This was more complex than anticipated, mainly due to the challenges of using scroll-triggered animations that only run on backward scrolling. This is valuable knowledge. The power hidden in the current spec is amazing; we can style based on very specific scrolling behaviors. However, we had to hack the API to access this power. An ideal solution would be:
<div> <div></div> </div> <main> <div><div></div></div> <div></div> <div><div></div></div> </main>
With such an API, the Spider-Pig swiper wouldn't require hacks.
I hope for broader browser support for scroll-driven animations and a more flexible spec to encourage designers to build nonlinear storytelling into their experiences. If not, once animation timelines are more widely supported, it might be time to make Web-Slinger.css more robust and production-ready.
The above is the detailed content of Web-Slinger.css: Across the Swiper-Verse. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

It's out! Congrats to the Vue team for getting it done, I know it was a massive effort and a long time coming. All new docs, as well.

I'd say "website" fits better than "mobile app" but I like this framing from Max Lynch:

I had someone write in with this very legit question. Lea just blogged about how you can get valid CSS properties themselves from the browser. That's like this.

If we need to show documentation to the user directly in the WordPress editor, what is the best way to do it?

The other day, I spotted this particularly lovely bit from Corey Ginnivan’s website where a collection of cards stack on top of one another as you scroll.

There are a number of these desktop apps where the goal is showing your site at different dimensions all at the same time. So you can, for example, be writing

CSS Grid is a collection of properties designed to make layout easier than it’s ever been. Like anything, there's a bit of a learning curve, but Grid is

I see Google Fonts rolled out a new design (Tweet). Compared to the last big redesign, this feels much more iterative. I can barely tell the difference
