Optimizing Web Fonts for Performance: the State of the Art

This article is a SiteGround partnership contribution. Thank you for supporting our sponsors.

Sixty-seven percent of websites now utilize custom web fonts. This widespread adoption, however, presents performance and user experience challenges. This article explores common pitfalls in web font implementation and offers solutions, including established workarounds and future-proof standards.

Key Points:

• Custom web fonts, used on 67% of websites, can negatively impact performance and user experience due to their size and loading times, potentially causing a Flash of Invisible Text (FOIT).
• Optimizing custom fonts involves minimizing typefaces, using browser-compatible formats (prioritizing WOFF2), loading only necessary styles, and limiting character sets.
• To combat FOIT, consider using system fonts, employing the Web Font Loader for asynchronous loading, or leveraging the CSS Font Loading API for granular control.
• The CSS font-display property offers advanced font-loading management, though browser support remains incomplete.
• While Flash of Unstyled Text (FOUT) might persist, its impact can be reduced by aligning fallback font metrics (x-height and width) with the custom font.

The Allure of Custom Web Fonts:

Website visitors prioritize content. Exceptional typography is therefore essential for readability, legibility, and brand identity. Custom web fonts—fonts not pre-installed on user devices—deliver superior typographic design. While the CSS @font-face rule has enabled widespread adoption, the inherent size of font files can impact site performance. Efficient font loading is paramount.

Understanding Flash of Invisible Text (FOIT):

The typical method of using custom fonts—defining them via CSS @font-face and relying on default browser behavior—is suboptimal. Browsers often delay font loading until CSS parsing is complete. Furthermore, as Zach Leatherman highlights, font downloads require specific conditions:

• An HTML element using the specified font-family.
• In WebKit and Blink browsers, the element must not be empty.
• For browsers supporting Unicode range descriptors, content must match the specified range.

This delayed download often results in FOIT: text invisibility until the font loads. Browser handling of FOIT varies:

• Blink and Firefox use a three-second timeout; if the font doesn't load, a fallback font is displayed, potentially leading to FOUT (Flash of Unstyled Text).
• Safari, Android's default browser, and Blackberry display no text until the font loads, leaving users with blank space.
• IE/Edge directly display the fallback font, a more user-friendly approach.

While FOUT is less disruptive than FOIT, ideally, both should be avoided. However, many experts consider FOUT preferable to FOIT.

Optimizing Custom Font Files:

Several strategies minimize font file size:

1. Minimize Typefaces: Use a small number of carefully chosen fonts.

2. Browser-Compatible Formats: Prioritize WOFF2, falling back to WOFF. Example:

   @font-face {
     font-family: 'Open Sans';
     src: local('Open Sans'), local('OpenSans'),
          url('fonts/open-sans.woff2') format('woff2'),
          url('fonts/open-sans.woff') format('woff');
   }

3. Load Only Necessary Styles: Avoid loading unused font variations (italic, bold, etc.).

4. Subset Character Sets: Include only the characters used on your page. (See Dudley Storey's "Slash Page Load Times With CSS Font Subsetting" for details).

Addressing FOIT:

Several methods mitigate FOIT:

1. Avoid Custom Fonts (Fallback to System Fonts): A simple, albeit less aesthetically pleasing, solution is to rely solely on system fonts. Example:

   body {
     font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif;
   }

2. Web Font Loader: This JavaScript library asynchronously loads fonts, displaying fallbacks until the custom font is available.

3. CSS Font Loading API: This standard API provides fine-grained control over font loading, enabling the use of system fonts until custom fonts are ready. (See Manuel Matuzovic's "Getting started with CSS Font Loading" for a tutorial).

The Future: CSS font-display:

The CSS font-display property offers granular control over font loading and fallback behavior. Values include auto, block, swap, fallback, and optional. While browser support is still limited, it represents the future of web font loading.

Mitigating FOUT:

While the above methods address FOIT, FOUT might still occur. Minimizing its impact involves matching the fallback font's x-height and width to the custom font's dimensions using tools like Monica Dinculescu's Font Style Matcher.

Conclusion:

Efficient web font management requires optimizing file size and controlling font loading behavior. The methods discussed here, along with the resources provided, offer effective solutions for enhancing website performance and user experience.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs):

(The FAQs section from the original input is already well-written and doesn't require significant modification for this rewrite.) The original FAQ section is retained as is.

The above is the detailed content of Optimizing Web Fonts for Performance: the State of the Art. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!