Why Zustand suceed in the React state management war?
Zustand's recent achievement of 49,000 GitHub stars is truly remarkable.
The React state management landscape has undergone a significant shift in recent years. Redux, once the dominant player, is gradually becoming a legacy library, its popularity waning.
The Redux Era
Redux's success was a double-edged sword. It emerged victorious from the "Flux Wars," becoming the default for React, particularly in the era of class-based components. However, its complexity led to widespread adoption even in applications where it wasn't strictly necessary, resulting in extensive boilerplate code for state management. A more user-friendly approach, like Redux Toolkit, might have altered its trajectory.
Enter Zustand
Zustand, maintained by Poimandres with Daishi Kato as lead maintainer, is part of a trio of state management solutions—Zustand, Jotai, and Valtio. While Valtio has seen less adoption, Jotai and Zustand represent a new generation, each with distinct characteristics.
Jotai, an atom-based library inspired by reactive programming, offers a minimalist API and is arguably the best atom-based tool for React. However, its atom-based model can present a learning curve for developers accustomed to more traditional data structures.
This is where Zustand excels. It feels like a refined, minimalist successor to Redux, seamlessly integrating state and actions, providing robust TypeScript support, and offering a powerful yet streamlined middleware system. This last point is crucial; extending functionality is often necessary, and Zustand's middleware approach is superior to Redux's more complex system.
Another key advantage is Zustand's multi-store approach, a significant departure from Redux's monolithic state. This allows for cleaner architecture, separating global state from local page/feature states, avoiding the complexities of large reducer combinations. This approach keeps local state outside the React component tree without resorting to the verbosity and potential confusion of React contexts.
Therefore, Zustand's success is unsurprising. It aligns with the intuitive React development style while offering a cleaner alternative to the complexities of older state management solutions, even surpassing the perceived simplicity of React contexts.
The above is the detailed content of Why Zustand suceed in the React state management war?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Different JavaScript engines have different effects when parsing and executing JavaScript code, because the implementation principles and optimization strategies of each engine differ. 1. Lexical analysis: convert source code into lexical unit. 2. Grammar analysis: Generate an abstract syntax tree. 3. Optimization and compilation: Generate machine code through the JIT compiler. 4. Execute: Run the machine code. V8 engine optimizes through instant compilation and hidden class, SpiderMonkey uses a type inference system, resulting in different performance performance on the same code.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.

JavaScript's application in the real world includes front-end and back-end development. 1) Display front-end applications by building a TODO list application, involving DOM operations and event processing. 2) Build RESTfulAPI through Node.js and Express to demonstrate back-end applications.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

Both Python and JavaScript's choices in development environments are important. 1) Python's development environment includes PyCharm, JupyterNotebook and Anaconda, which are suitable for data science and rapid prototyping. 2) The development environment of JavaScript includes Node.js, VSCode and Webpack, which are suitable for front-end and back-end development. Choosing the right tools according to project needs can improve development efficiency and project success rate.
