Plutonian Pebbles
Advent of Code 2024, Day 11: Pebble Proliferation
Part 1: Mapping Pebble Cycles
This problem involves tracking the evolution of pebbles through a series of transformations. The initial approach, simulating 25 iterations, proved feasible for Part 1. However, the exponential growth of pebbles suggests a different strategy will be needed for Part 2, where far more iterations are required. The key is to understand the pebble transformation rules and how they affect the overall pebble count.
Pebble Transformation Rules:
Rule 1: A pebble with the value 0 transforms into a pebble with the value 1.
Rule 2: Even-length numbered pebbles split into two new pebbles, each half the original number's length.
Rule 3: Odd-length numbered pebbles multiply their value by 2024.
Implementation and Testing:
The blink()
function implements the transformation rules:
function blink(num) { let str = String(num); if (num === 0) { return 1; } else if (str.length % 2 === 0) { return [+(str.slice(0, str.length / 2)), +(str.slice(str.length / 2))]; } else { return num * 2024; } }
Note the use of
to convert string slices back to numbers. Initial testing with example inputs confirmed the function's accuracy. Iterative processing using flatMap
efficiently handles the splitting of pebbles. The solution successfully processed 25 iterations for the puzzle input, yielding the correct answer.
Part 2: Conquering Exponential Growth
Part 2 presents a significant computational challenge due to the rapid increase in the number of pebbles. My initial approach of direct simulation proved computationally infeasible. The number of pebbles explodes beyond manageable limits after only a few dozen iterations.
Exploring Optimization Strategies:
To address this, I investigated several strategies:
-
Cycle Detection: I explored the possibility of detecting repeating patterns in pebble values to avoid redundant computations. While some numbers exhibited limited, finite sets of generated values, this pattern wasn't universally applicable, rendering this approach insufficient.
-
Pebble Catalog: I attempted to create a catalog of pebble values and their subsequent transformations. The goal was to reuse pre-computed results to speed up the process. While the catalog did reduce computation for some pebbles, the overall improvement was not significant enough to handle the scale of Part 2.
Roadblock and Reflection:
Despite exploring these optimization techniques, I was unable to find a solution that efficiently handles the exponential growth of pebbles in Part 2. The computational complexity of the problem, combined with the lack of easily identifiable patterns, proved insurmountable within the constraints of my current approach. The challenge highlighted the importance of considering computational complexity when designing algorithms for problems with potentially explosive growth. While I successfully solved Part 1, Part 2 remains unsolved.
The above is the detailed content of Plutonian Pebbles. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











The latest trends in JavaScript include the rise of TypeScript, the popularity of modern frameworks and libraries, and the application of WebAssembly. Future prospects cover more powerful type systems, the development of server-side JavaScript, the expansion of artificial intelligence and machine learning, and the potential of IoT and edge computing.

Different JavaScript engines have different effects when parsing and executing JavaScript code, because the implementation principles and optimization strategies of each engine differ. 1. Lexical analysis: convert source code into lexical unit. 2. Grammar analysis: Generate an abstract syntax tree. 3. Optimization and compilation: Generate machine code through the JIT compiler. 4. Execute: Run the machine code. V8 engine optimizes through instant compilation and hidden class, SpiderMonkey uses a type inference system, resulting in different performance performance on the same code.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

JavaScript is the core language of modern web development and is widely used for its diversity and flexibility. 1) Front-end development: build dynamic web pages and single-page applications through DOM operations and modern frameworks (such as React, Vue.js, Angular). 2) Server-side development: Node.js uses a non-blocking I/O model to handle high concurrency and real-time applications. 3) Mobile and desktop application development: cross-platform development is realized through ReactNative and Electron to improve development efficiency.

This article demonstrates frontend integration with a backend secured by Permit, building a functional EdTech SaaS application using Next.js. The frontend fetches user permissions to control UI visibility and ensures API requests adhere to role-base

I built a functional multi-tenant SaaS application (an EdTech app) with your everyday tech tool and you can do the same. First, what’s a multi-tenant SaaS application? Multi-tenant SaaS applications let you serve multiple customers from a sing

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.
