


Why Does C# Throw an 'Ambiguous Invocation' Error When Using Method Groups with Overloaded Delegate Methods?
C# compiler ambiguous call error: method group and delegate type
In C#, when calling a function with multiple overloads using method group syntax, the compiler may encounter an "ambiguous call" error. This error occurs because the compiler cannot determine which overload to call when there are two method groups with compatible delegate types.
Consider the following code example:
public class ClassWithDelegateMethods { public void Method(Func<string> func) { /* do something */ } public void Method(Action action) { /* do something */ } } public class ClassWithSimpleMethods { public string GetString() { return ""; } public void DoNothing() { } } public class Program { public static void Main(string[] args) { // 错误:歧义调用 ClassWithDelegateMethods classWithDelegateMethods = new ClassWithDelegateMethods(); classWithDelegateMethods.Method(classWithSimpleMethods.GetString); // 这里会报错 classWithDelegateMethods.Method(classWithSimpleMethods.DoNothing); // 这里会报错 } }
ClassWithDelegateMethods.Method
can be called using anonymous methods or lambda expressions without any problems. However, calling classWithSimpleMethods.GetString
or classWithSimpleMethods.DoNothing
using method group syntax results in an ambiguity error.
The reason for this error lies in the implicit conversion rules between method groups and delegate types. According to the C# specification, there are implicit conversions between method groups to compatible delegate types. However, for method groups with overloads, the specification does not define a mechanism for determining which overload to convert to.
Avoid ambiguous errors
To resolve ambiguity errors, method groups can be explicitly cast to the required delegate type. For example:
// 无错误 classWithDelegateMethods.Method((Func<string>)classWithSimpleMethods.GetString); classWithDelegateMethods.Method((Action)classWithSimpleMethods.DoNothing);
Alternatively, starting with C# 7.3, the compiler's improved overload candidate selection algorithm eliminates this problem. Therefore, in C# 7.3 and above, the above code example should compile without explicit conversion.
The above is the detailed content of Why Does C# Throw an 'Ambiguous Invocation' Error When Using Method Groups with Overloaded Delegate Methods?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











The history and evolution of C# and C are unique, and the future prospects are also different. 1.C was invented by BjarneStroustrup in 1983 to introduce object-oriented programming into the C language. Its evolution process includes multiple standardizations, such as C 11 introducing auto keywords and lambda expressions, C 20 introducing concepts and coroutines, and will focus on performance and system-level programming in the future. 2.C# was released by Microsoft in 2000. Combining the advantages of C and Java, its evolution focuses on simplicity and productivity. For example, C#2.0 introduced generics and C#5.0 introduced asynchronous programming, which will focus on developers' productivity and cloud computing in the future.

There are significant differences in the learning curves of C# and C and developer experience. 1) The learning curve of C# is relatively flat and is suitable for rapid development and enterprise-level applications. 2) The learning curve of C is steep and is suitable for high-performance and low-level control scenarios.

The application of static analysis in C mainly includes discovering memory management problems, checking code logic errors, and improving code security. 1) Static analysis can identify problems such as memory leaks, double releases, and uninitialized pointers. 2) It can detect unused variables, dead code and logical contradictions. 3) Static analysis tools such as Coverity can detect buffer overflow, integer overflow and unsafe API calls to improve code security.

C interacts with XML through third-party libraries (such as TinyXML, Pugixml, Xerces-C). 1) Use the library to parse XML files and convert them into C-processable data structures. 2) When generating XML, convert the C data structure to XML format. 3) In practical applications, XML is often used for configuration files and data exchange to improve development efficiency.

Using the chrono library in C can allow you to control time and time intervals more accurately. Let's explore the charm of this library. C's chrono library is part of the standard library, which provides a modern way to deal with time and time intervals. For programmers who have suffered from time.h and ctime, chrono is undoubtedly a boon. It not only improves the readability and maintainability of the code, but also provides higher accuracy and flexibility. Let's start with the basics. The chrono library mainly includes the following key components: std::chrono::system_clock: represents the system clock, used to obtain the current time. std::chron

The future of C will focus on parallel computing, security, modularization and AI/machine learning: 1) Parallel computing will be enhanced through features such as coroutines; 2) Security will be improved through stricter type checking and memory management mechanisms; 3) Modulation will simplify code organization and compilation; 4) AI and machine learning will prompt C to adapt to new needs, such as numerical computing and GPU programming support.

C isnotdying;it'sevolving.1)C remainsrelevantduetoitsversatilityandefficiencyinperformance-criticalapplications.2)Thelanguageiscontinuouslyupdated,withC 20introducingfeatureslikemodulesandcoroutinestoimproveusabilityandperformance.3)Despitechallen

DMA in C refers to DirectMemoryAccess, a direct memory access technology, allowing hardware devices to directly transmit data to memory without CPU intervention. 1) DMA operation is highly dependent on hardware devices and drivers, and the implementation method varies from system to system. 2) Direct access to memory may bring security risks, and the correctness and security of the code must be ensured. 3) DMA can improve performance, but improper use may lead to degradation of system performance. Through practice and learning, we can master the skills of using DMA and maximize its effectiveness in scenarios such as high-speed data transmission and real-time signal processing.
