Why Do std::async Futures Have Blocking Destructors?
Why the Block: Reasons Behind the Blocking Destructors of Futures Returned by std::async
When working with asynchronous tasks, the destructor of a future returned by std::async is noted for its blocking behavior, raising questions about its necessity. To delve into this design choice, let's explore the concerns and discussions that led to its implementation.
Herb Sutter's paper, "async, ~future, and ~thread," highlights safety considerations related to blocking destructors. Without this behavior, a "run-away" thread associated with the future could continue executing after its associated state has been destroyed. This lack of control over task completion could potentially lead to memory corruption or other unexpected issues.
Hans Boehm's paper, "Async() future destructors must wait," provides a concrete example of this concern. Without blocking destructors, exception handling or external events could disrupt the expected flow of task execution. As Boehm points out, this could create a security vulnerability where an attacker could manipulate the timing of exceptions to exploit an oversight in scope guards, leading to stack overwriting and process hijacking.
The blocking destructor serves as a safeguard against these potential hazards, preventing the associated thread from continuing execution after the future is destroyed. However, it's important to note that this behavior is specific to futures returned by std::async with an asynchronous launch policy. Other futures, such as those returned by std::promise or futures from parallel algorithms, do not exhibit the same blocking behavior in their destructors.
Despite the safety concerns raised, the blocking destructor of std::async futures has been a topic of ongoing debate within the C standardization committee. Proposed changes to deprecate the blocking behavior or make it non-standard for async futures have not been embraced.
In summary, the blocking destructors of futures returned by std::async is a controversial design choice driven by safety concerns. While it prevents potential issues related to uncontrolled thread execution, it also introduces the need for explicit management of thread lifecycle and scope guards to ensure proper cleanup.
The above is the detailed content of Why Do std::async Futures Have Blocking Destructors?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











The history and evolution of C# and C are unique, and the future prospects are also different. 1.C was invented by BjarneStroustrup in 1983 to introduce object-oriented programming into the C language. Its evolution process includes multiple standardizations, such as C 11 introducing auto keywords and lambda expressions, C 20 introducing concepts and coroutines, and will focus on performance and system-level programming in the future. 2.C# was released by Microsoft in 2000. Combining the advantages of C and Java, its evolution focuses on simplicity and productivity. For example, C#2.0 introduced generics and C#5.0 introduced asynchronous programming, which will focus on developers' productivity and cloud computing in the future.

There are significant differences in the learning curves of C# and C and developer experience. 1) The learning curve of C# is relatively flat and is suitable for rapid development and enterprise-level applications. 2) The learning curve of C is steep and is suitable for high-performance and low-level control scenarios.

C interacts with XML through third-party libraries (such as TinyXML, Pugixml, Xerces-C). 1) Use the library to parse XML files and convert them into C-processable data structures. 2) When generating XML, convert the C data structure to XML format. 3) In practical applications, XML is often used for configuration files and data exchange to improve development efficiency.

The application of static analysis in C mainly includes discovering memory management problems, checking code logic errors, and improving code security. 1) Static analysis can identify problems such as memory leaks, double releases, and uninitialized pointers. 2) It can detect unused variables, dead code and logical contradictions. 3) Static analysis tools such as Coverity can detect buffer overflow, integer overflow and unsafe API calls to improve code security.

Using the chrono library in C can allow you to control time and time intervals more accurately. Let's explore the charm of this library. C's chrono library is part of the standard library, which provides a modern way to deal with time and time intervals. For programmers who have suffered from time.h and ctime, chrono is undoubtedly a boon. It not only improves the readability and maintainability of the code, but also provides higher accuracy and flexibility. Let's start with the basics. The chrono library mainly includes the following key components: std::chrono::system_clock: represents the system clock, used to obtain the current time. std::chron

C still has important relevance in modern programming. 1) High performance and direct hardware operation capabilities make it the first choice in the fields of game development, embedded systems and high-performance computing. 2) Rich programming paradigms and modern features such as smart pointers and template programming enhance its flexibility and efficiency. Although the learning curve is steep, its powerful capabilities make it still important in today's programming ecosystem.

The future of C will focus on parallel computing, security, modularization and AI/machine learning: 1) Parallel computing will be enhanced through features such as coroutines; 2) Security will be improved through stricter type checking and memory management mechanisms; 3) Modulation will simplify code organization and compilation; 4) AI and machine learning will prompt C to adapt to new needs, such as numerical computing and GPU programming support.

C isnotdying;it'sevolving.1)C remainsrelevantduetoitsversatilityandefficiencyinperformance-criticalapplications.2)Thelanguageiscontinuouslyupdated,withC 20introducingfeatureslikemodulesandcoroutinestoimproveusabilityandperformance.3)Despitechallen
