Why Do Go Structs with the Same Fields Have Different Sizes?
Struct Field Ordering and Size
The code provided demonstrates an intriguing behavior:
1 2 3 4 |
|
}
type B struct {
1 2 3 |
|
}
When printing the sizes of A{} and B{} using unsafe.Sizeof, we obtain surprising results:
1 |
|
Why do these structs have different sizes despite having the same fields?
Field Alignment
The answer lies in field alignment. In Go, addresses of variables must be aligned based on their type, and this alignment is especially important for types like int64 (8-byte alignment). In the case of A, the first field a is a bool, which requires only 1 byte of storage. After this field, there is a 7-byte implicit padding to align the next field b (of type int64) on an 8-byte boundary. However, in the case of B, since the first field b is already aligned on an 8-byte boundary, there is no need for any implicit padding, resulting in a smaller struct size of 16 bytes.
Size of an Empty Struct
Moving on, we encounter another interesting case:
1 |
|
When printing unsafe.Sizeof(C{}), we unexpectedly get an output of 0. How is this possible, given that every struct occupies some memory?
Zero-Size Values
The Go specification states that a struct or array with no fields or elements with a size greater than zero has a size of zero. It also implies that two distinct zero-size variables may share the same memory address. This is the case with C{}, which has a size of zero and may not occupy any actual memory. Instead, it can reference the same memory address as other zero-size values, such as struct{}{}, []int{}, or even the empty array [3]struct{}{}.
Conclusion
Understanding field alignment and the concept of zero-size values enhances our comprehension of Go's memory management. By arranging fields strategically within a struct, we can optimize memory allocation and ensure efficient data manipulation.
The above is the detailed content of Why Do Go Structs with the Same Fields Have Different Sizes?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.
