


Does Go's `errors.Is` and `errors.As` Support Recursive Error Wrapping?
Recursive Error Wrapping in Go
Go's error handling mechanism provides methods such as Is() and As() for error inspection. However, it is often assumed that these methods support recursive error wrapping. This is not entirely true.
Using fmt.Errorf with the %w verb only allows for shallow error wrapping. To achieve true recursion, a custom error type is necessary.
Typically, a custom error type would include a pointer to the wrapped error as well as a method to unwrap it. However, simply wrapping errors in this manner introduces a problem. If multiple wrapped errors share the same pointer, error comparison will fail since Go errors are compared by address.
A solution is to implement Is() and As() methods within the custom error type. These methods should compare the embedded error instead of the custom type itself, allowing for full recursive error wrapping without address-based issues.
For example, here is a simplified version of an error type that supports recursive wrapping:
type errorChain struct { err error next *errorChain } func (c errorChain) Is(err error) bool { return errors.Is(c.err, err) } func (c errorChain) As(target any) bool { return errors.As(c.err, target) } func (c errorChain) Unwrap() error { return c.next }
This error type can then be used to wrap errors as desired, allowing for full error inspection using Is() and As().
The above is the detailed content of Does Go's `errors.Is` and `errors.As` Support Recursive Error Wrapping?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goisidealforbeginnersandsuitableforcloudandnetworkservicesduetoitssimplicity,efficiency,andconcurrencyfeatures.1)InstallGofromtheofficialwebsiteandverifywith'goversion'.2)Createandrunyourfirstprogramwith'gorunhello.go'.3)Exploreconcurrencyusinggorout

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.

Golangisidealforbuildingscalablesystemsduetoitsefficiencyandconcurrency,whilePythonexcelsinquickscriptinganddataanalysisduetoitssimplicityandvastecosystem.Golang'sdesignencouragesclean,readablecodeanditsgoroutinesenableefficientconcurrentoperations,t
