


Why Do Chrome and Firefox Render Heights Differently When Using 'auto' or Percentage Heights?
Heights Rendering Differently in Chrome and Firefox: Understanding the Cause
In the realm of CSS rendering, subtle differences between browsers can pose challenges. One such discrepancy arises when setting a block element's height to "auto" or a percentage without explicitly setting its parent's height. This behavior manifests in particular when the block-level child element has a bottom margin. While Chrome treats the height as calculated based on the child's margin and content, Firefox displays the same height value regardless.
Exploring the CSS Specifications
W3C, the governing body for website standards, defines the "height" property to compute as "auto" if the containing block's height is not explicitly set. Additionally, "auto" height in block-level elements is determined by the presence of block-level children and whether padding or borders exist. This definition remains vague and open to interpretation.
Browser Differences Emerge
Despite the standardization efforts, browsers exhibit varying interpretations of how percentage heights should behave. Chrome's adherence to specifying a parent height aligns with the traditional understanding of the spec, prioritizing the height property. However, Mozilla's engines, in keeping with their mission to promote accessibility, have broadened their interpretation to include Flexbox heights.
Alternative Solutions
Recognizing these discrepancies, developers working with percentage heights should consider alternative solutions. Deploying "display: flex" on the parent with "align-items: stretch" ensures the child extends to the parent's full height. Alternatively, "position: relative" on the parent and "position: absolute; height: 100%; width: 100%" on the child achieves the same effect.
In summary, the varied behavior of percentage heights across Chrome and Firefox reflects the inherent difficulty in interpreting specifications that leave room for ambiguity. Until W3C amends these specifications to account for modern CSS techniques, developers must carefully navigate browser differences and consider alternative solutions to ensure consistent rendering of their designs.
The above is the detailed content of Why Do Chrome and Firefox Render Heights Differently When Using 'auto' or Percentage Heights?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

It's out! Congrats to the Vue team for getting it done, I know it was a massive effort and a long time coming. All new docs, as well.

I had someone write in with this very legit question. Lea just blogged about how you can get valid CSS properties themselves from the browser. That's like this.

I'd say "website" fits better than "mobile app" but I like this framing from Max Lynch:

The other day, I spotted this particularly lovely bit from Corey Ginnivan’s website where a collection of cards stack on top of one another as you scroll.

If we need to show documentation to the user directly in the WordPress editor, what is the best way to do it?

There are a number of these desktop apps where the goal is showing your site at different dimensions all at the same time. So you can, for example, be writing

CSS Grid is a collection of properties designed to make layout easier than it’s ever been. Like anything, there's a bit of a learning curve, but Grid is

I see Google Fonts rolled out a new design (Tweet). Compared to the last big redesign, this feels much more iterative. I can barely tell the difference
