


Why Do Go and Pycrypto Produce Different AES-CFB Encryption Results?
Inconsistent AES-CFB Encryption Results between Go and Pycrypto
Utilizing AES-CFB encryption, varying results are obtained upon comparison between Go and Pycrypto. To investigate this discrepancy, we analyze the provided code samples.
In Python, Crypto.Cipher.AES utilizes MODE_CFB with an explicitly specified initial vector (IV). Conversely, in Go, aes.NewCipher requires explicit creation of an AES block cipher and subsequent instantiation of CFBEncrypter or CFBDecrypter with the desired IV.
A critical distinction between the two implementations lies in their treatment of segment size. Pycrypto operates on 8-bit segments, known as CFB8, while Go uses 16-bit segments by default. This difference leads to the observed divergence in encryption outcomes.
Adapting Go to Python's CFB8 Approach
To allow Go to decrypt ciphertext encrypted by Pycrypto with CFB8 settings, the source code for Go's CFBDecrypter can be modified. Specifically, the XORKeyStream method can be adapted to handle 8-bit segments.
This modification would enable Go to decryptciphertext encrypted using Pycrypto's specific AES-CFB8 parameters, fostering interoperability between the two languages in handling encryption and decryption tasks.
The above is the detailed content of Why Do Go and Pycrypto Produce Different AES-CFB Encryption Results?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.
