


Text compression & Code splitting & Modern image formats - Performance optimization
I tried the following to optimize my side project performance:
- text compression
- code splitting
- modern image formats.
Profiler
The app I built used Vite with pnpm. Modern web build tools automatically optimize web performance by default in the build process. So we can pnpm run build then pnpm dlx serve dist. Then use Lighthouse of Chrome DevTools as a guide to address each bottleneck it lists.
Enable text compression
It affects FCP and LCP.
The first thing that Lighthouse suggests is compressing text using algorithms like br or gzip.
The common practice is to add Accept-Encoding: gzip whenever making web requests. Since the app I am building serves the resource locally, I installed the vite-plugin-compress to compress the files.
Step 1: install vite-plugin-compress
Step 2: configure the vite.config.js file, and add the plugin and some parameters. As Google Developers suggests, it should use br(brotliCompress) over gzip as much as possible.
For example
viteCompression({ verbose: true, disable: false, algorithm: 'brotliCompress', ext: '.br', }),
Step 3: run pnpm run build to compress
It successfully compressed .js and .css files.
Logs:
✨ [vite-plugin-compression]:algorithm=brotliCompress - compressed file successfully.
Vite would compress the file by default using .gzip, but brotliCompress can do better, compression during the build process:
Vite with gzip
vite v5.4.10 building for production...
✓ 654 modules transformed.index-B9QUW17e.css 8.60 kB │ gzip: 2.33 kB
PauseMenu-DjZ95K-6.js 1.77 kB │ gzip: 0.62 kB
index-ohAKp9W9.js 1,688.05 kB │ gzip: 454.20 kBVite-plugin-compression with br
✨ [vite-plugin-compression]:algorithm=brotliCompress - compressed file successfully:
PauseMenu-DjZ95K-6.js.br 1.73kb / brotliCompress: 0.51kb
index-B9QUW17e.css.br 8.40kb / brotliCompress: 1.97kb
index-ohAKp9W9.js.br 1648.49kb / brotliCompress: 345.30kb
Reducing unused JavaScript
It affects FCP and LCP.
Use the Coverage Tab in Google DevTools to see the scripts that have unused bytes over 20kbs.
Since I am using Vite with React, code splitting is the first thing about reducing unused JavaScript.
In React,
- Use
to wrap the whole App and provide a fallback UI, like Loading, this provides a fallback UI when the app is loading. - Use lazy() to wrap the components which not used on the initial page. For example, for games, when users press down the Esc key, a menu that you can wrap up pops up.
Serve images with modern formats
Chrome Developers suggests serving images in AVIF or WebP format. I chose WebP because it has more support across browsers.
The latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, and Opera support WebP, while AVIF support is more limited.
You can check WebP image format support info at Can I use.
You can install the cwebp library at WebP and use the command cwebp -q 50 images/flower1.jpg -o images/flower1.webp to convert .png to .webp.
This command converts, at a quality of 50 (0 is the worst; 100 is the best), the images/flower1.jpg file and saves it as images/flower1.webp.
The compression result is quite impressive. One of the files is reduced in size from 3.5 MB to 178kb. Even the low information intensity ones give 4x compression.
We can even write a simple .bat script to automatically convert all the .png images under the target folder into .webp images.
viteCompression({ verbose: true, disable: false, algorithm: 'brotliCompress', ext: '.br', }),
Reference
- Remove unused JavaScript
- View used and unused CSS with the Coverage tab.
- Serve images in modern formats.
- Creating WebP Images with the Command Line
- Precompiled Utilities
- WebP image format - Can I Use
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
- First Contentful Paint (FCP)
The above is the detailed content of Text compression & Code splitting & Modern image formats - Performance optimization. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Different JavaScript engines have different effects when parsing and executing JavaScript code, because the implementation principles and optimization strategies of each engine differ. 1. Lexical analysis: convert source code into lexical unit. 2. Grammar analysis: Generate an abstract syntax tree. 3. Optimization and compilation: Generate machine code through the JIT compiler. 4. Execute: Run the machine code. V8 engine optimizes through instant compilation and hidden class, SpiderMonkey uses a type inference system, resulting in different performance performance on the same code.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.

JavaScript's application in the real world includes front-end and back-end development. 1) Display front-end applications by building a TODO list application, involving DOM operations and event processing. 2) Build RESTfulAPI through Node.js and Express to demonstrate back-end applications.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

Both Python and JavaScript's choices in development environments are important. 1) Python's development environment includes PyCharm, JupyterNotebook and Anaconda, which are suitable for data science and rapid prototyping. 2) The development environment of JavaScript includes Node.js, VSCode and Webpack, which are suitable for front-end and back-end development. Choosing the right tools according to project needs can improve development efficiency and project success rate.
