


Should I Use `DB.exec()` or Prepared Statements in Go for Queries Without Result Rows?
Deciphering the Conundrum of Using *DB.exec() and Prepared Statements in Golang
Introduction
In the realm of database manipulation using Go and Postgresql, the lingering question arises: why bother with DB.exec() or prepared statements when Go seemingly automates their creation? This article delves into the intricacies of executing operations that do not return rows and elucidates the rationale behind using prepared statements.
Why Use DB.exec()?
While it's true that DB.Query() and DB.exec() can be used interchangeably to execute SQL statements, they differ in the type of result they return. DB.exec() provides insights into the number of rows affected by the query, whereas DB.Query() returns a result set.
For instance, suppose you wish to execute a DELETE statement and ascertain the number of deleted rows. Using DB.exec() is the preferred approach:
res, err := db.Exec(`DELETE FROM my_table WHERE expires_at = `, time.Now()) if err != nil { panic(err) } numDeleted, err := res.RowsAffected() if err != nil { panic(err) } print(numDeleted)
Alternatively, the more cumbersome approach would involve using DB.Query() and loop through the rows to count them:
rows, err := db.Query(`DELETE FROM my_table WHERE expires_at = RETURNING *`, time.Now()) if err != nil { panic(err) } defer rows.Close() var numDeleted int for rows.Next() { numDeleted += 1 } if err := rows.Err(); err != nil { panic(err) } print(numDeleted)
Moreover, when the result of a query is irrelevant and you merely need to execute it, DB.exec() offers a concise solution:
if _, err := db.Exec(`<my_sql_query>`); err != nil { panic(err) }
In contrast, leaving out the close call for the returned DB.Rows value when using DB.Query() will eventually lead to an overload of open connections due to memory leaks.
Delving into Prepared Statements
While it's been suggested that Go automatically creates prepared statements, the reality appears to be more nuanced. The behavior of DB.Query() seems to hinge on the underlying driver being used.
Nevertheless, preparing and reusing DB.Stmt can improve performance for frequently executed queries. A glimpse into the official Postgresql documentation reveals how prepared statements can optimize operations.
Conclusion
Understanding the distinctions between DB.exec() and prepared statements in Golang helps developers execute operations that do not return rows efficiently and leverage the benefits of prepared statements when seeking performance optimizations.
The above is the detailed content of Should I Use `DB.exec()` or Prepared Statements in Go for Queries Without Result Rows?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goisidealforbeginnersandsuitableforcloudandnetworkservicesduetoitssimplicity,efficiency,andconcurrencyfeatures.1)InstallGofromtheofficialwebsiteandverifywith'goversion'.2)Createandrunyourfirstprogramwith'gorunhello.go'.3)Exploreconcurrencyusinggorout

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.

Golangisidealforbuildingscalablesystemsduetoitsefficiencyandconcurrency,whilePythonexcelsinquickscriptinganddataanalysisduetoitssimplicityandvastecosystem.Golang'sdesignencouragesclean,readablecodeanditsgoroutinesenableefficientconcurrentoperations,t
