


How to Gracefully Stop a Goroutine Execution on Timeout in the Iris Framework?
Stopping Goroutine Execution on Timeout Using Iris Framework
When working with goroutines, it is often necessary to stop their execution if they exceed a certain time limit. However, a commonly encountered issue is that goroutines continue to execute even after a timeout has occurred.
In an attempt to address this problem, the following code snippet is used:
import ( "fmt" "time" "github.com/kataras/iris/v12" ) type Response struct { data interface{} status bool } func (s *CicService) Find() (interface{}, bool) { ch := make(chan Response, 1) go func() { time.Sleep(10 * time.Second) fmt.Println("test") fmt.Println("test1") ch <- Response{data: "data", status: true} }() select { case <-ch: fmt.Println("Read from ch") res := <-ch return res.data, res.status case <-time.After(50 * time.Millisecond): return "Timed out", false } }
This code utilizes a buffered channel and a select statement to attempt to terminate a goroutine if a timeout of 50 milliseconds passes. However, the expected output of "Timed out" is not achieved. Instead, the output includes both the timeout message and the subsequent "test" and "test1" printouts.
To understand why this occurs, it is important to consider the behavior of goroutines in Go. In Go, there is no efficient way to forcibly stop a running goroutine. Instead, synchronization mechanisms such as channels and mutexes must be employed.
The timeout employed in the code is a timeout on the channel's receiving operation, not on the goroutine itself. Hence, even if the receive operation times out, the goroutine that was sending to the channel continues to execute, resulting in the subsequent printouts.
In this situation, it is necessary to implement some form of synchronicity between the goroutines. This could involve using a signal channel or a context to communicate the timeout to the goroutine that is performing the long-running task, allowing it to gracefully handle the cancellation.
By understanding the limitations of goroutine execution in Go and employing appropriate synchronization techniques, it is possible to effectively stop goroutines on timeout.
The above is the detailed content of How to Gracefully Stop a Goroutine Execution on Timeout in the Iris Framework?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.
