How to Handle Inconsistent JSON Fields: Strings vs. String Arrays?
Unmarshalling Inconsistent JSON Fields with Arrays and Strings
Unmarshalling JSON can be challenging when the data is inconsistent, such as when a field can be either a string or an array of strings. To handle this scenario, we can employ various strategies.
Capturing Varying Data Using RawMessage
For fields with varying types, we can use json.RawMessage to capture the unparsed data. This allows us to manipulate the field after unmarshalling the top-level JSON.
Hiding Fields with "-" Tag
To hide the "DisplayName" field from automatic decoding, we can use the "-" tag in the struct definition. This prevents the application from assigning values to that field during top-level unmarshalling.
Determining Field Type and Populating
Once the top-level JSON has been decoded, we can inspect the type of the RawDisplayName field to determine whether it is a string or an array. If it is a string, we unmarshal it into a string slice. If it is an array, we join the values with "&&" per the original question.
Custom Unmarshal Interface
For scenarios with multiple fields of varying types, it can be beneficial to encapsulate the parsing logic in a custom type that implements the json.Unmarshaler interface. This allows for centralized control over the data conversion process.
Example Implementation
Here is an example implementation that handles the specified JSON:
package main import ( "encoding/json" "fmt" "strings" ) type multiString string func (ms *multiString) UnmarshalJSON(data []byte) error { *ms = "" if len(data) > 0 { switch data[0] { case '"': var s string if err := json.Unmarshal(data, &s); err != nil { return err } *ms = multiString(s) case '[': var s []string if err := json.Unmarshal(data, &s); err != nil { return err } *ms = multiString(strings.Join(s, "&&")) } } return nil } type MyListItem struct { Date string `json:"date"` DisplayName multiString `json:"display_name"` } type MyListings struct { CLItems []MyListItem `json:"myitems"` } func main() { var listings MyListings err := json.Unmarshal([]byte(`{ "date": "30 Apr", "display_name": "Mr Smith" },{ "date": "30 Apr", "display_name": ["Mr Smith", "Mr Jones"] }`), &listings) if err != nil { fmt.Println(err) return } fmt.Println(listings) }
By using these techniques, we can effectively unmarshal JSON with fields of varying types, ensuring that the application can handle the data correctly.
The above is the detailed content of How to Handle Inconsistent JSON Fields: Strings vs. String Arrays?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goisidealforbeginnersandsuitableforcloudandnetworkservicesduetoitssimplicity,efficiency,andconcurrencyfeatures.1)InstallGofromtheofficialwebsiteandverifywith'goversion'.2)Createandrunyourfirstprogramwith'gorunhello.go'.3)Exploreconcurrencyusinggorout

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.
