


Why Does Marshaling []byte to JSON Result in a Base64 Encoded String?
Marshaling []byte to JSON: Understanding String Representation
When attempting to marshal []byte values into JSON format, you may encounter peculiar string outputs like the one highlighted in the original question. This article addresses both sides of the enigma: how to correctly marshal []byte to JSON and why the output transforms into the observed string.
Solution: Marshaling []byte to JSON
According to the official Golang documentation for json.Marshal, array and slice values encode as JSON arrays. An exception to this rule applies to []byte slices, which are specifically encoded as base64-encoded strings. Conversely, nil slices are encoded as null JSON objects.
Therefore, to accurately marshal []byte to JSON, it must be explicitly cast as a base64-encoded string during the marshaling process.
Reason: Base64 Encoding for []byte
The behavior observed in the original question's output is a direct consequence of the encoding mechanism used for []byte slices in JSON. JSON cannot natively represent raw byte slices; hence, they are converted into base64-encoded strings. Base64 encoding allows for the representation of binary data as a string, making it suitable for transmission and storage in text-based formats like JSON.
For instance, the string "AAAAAQID" seen in the output represents the base64-encoded version of the []byte slice [0, 0, 0, 1, 2, 3].
To retrieve the original byte slice from its base64 representation, you can use the base64.StdEncoding.DecodeString function, as illustrated in the code below:
import "encoding/base64" func decodeBase64(encodedString string) ([]byte, error) { return base64.StdEncoding.DecodeString(encodedString) }
Conclusion
Marshaling []byte to JSON involves explicitly encoding them as base64 strings, a technique driven by the need to represent binary data within a text-based format. Understanding this encoding mechanism helps demystify the seemingly strange string outputs encountered during the marshaling process.
The above is the detailed content of Why Does Marshaling []byte to JSON Result in a Base64 Encoded String?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goisidealforbeginnersandsuitableforcloudandnetworkservicesduetoitssimplicity,efficiency,andconcurrencyfeatures.1)InstallGofromtheofficialwebsiteandverifywith'goversion'.2)Createandrunyourfirstprogramwith'gorunhello.go'.3)Exploreconcurrencyusinggorout

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.
