Adding filter query parameters in Go Huma
From what I have been able to find out, Huma unfortunately doesn't support array query filters like this: filters[]=filter1&filters[]=filter2 (neither leaving the brackets out, e.g. filter=filter1&filter=filter2). I came across this Github issue that gives an example of separating the filters by comma https://github.com/danielgtaylor/huma/issues/325, so that's what we ended up doing: filters=postcode:eq:RM7(EX,created:gt:2024-01-01
Documenting filters
Unlike the body parameters, which one can simply specify as structs and then they get both validated and generated in the documentation, the documentation and validation for filters has to be done separately.
The documentation can simply be added under the description attribute of the Huma.Param object (under Operation):
Parameters: []*huma.Param{{ Name: "filters", In: "query", Description: "Filter properties by various fields. Separate filters by comma.\n\n" + "Format: field:operator:value\n\n" + "Supported fields:\n" + "- postcode (operator: eq)\n" + "- created (operators: gt, lt, gte, lte)\n", Schema: &huma.Schema{ Type: "string", Items: &huma.Schema{ Type: "string", Pattern: "^[a-zA-Z_]+:(eq|neq|gt|lt|gte|lte):[a-zA-Z0-9-:.]+$", }, Examples: []any{ "postcode:eq:RM7 8EX", "created:gt:2024-01-01", }, }, Required: false, }},
We can now define our PropertyFilterParams struct for validation:
type FilterParam struct { Field string Operator string Value interface{} } type PropertyFilterParams struct { Items []FilterParam } func (s *PropertyFilterParams) UnmarshalText(text []byte) error { equalityFields := []string{"postcode"} greaterSmallerFields := []string{} dateFields := []string{"created"} for _, item := range strings.Split(string(text), ",") { filterParam, err := parseAndValidateFilterItem(item, equalityFields, greaterSmallerFields, dateFields) if err != nil { return err } s.Items = append(s.Items, filterParam) } return nil } func (s *PropertyFilterParams) Schema(registry huma.Registry) *huma.Schema { return &huma.Schema{ Type: huma.TypeString, } } func parseAndValidateFilterItem(item string, equalityFields []string, greaterSmallerFields []string, dateFields []string) (FilterParam, error) { parts := strings.SplitN(item, ":", 3) field := parts[0] operator := parts[1] value := parts[2] if contains(equalityFields, field) { if operator != "eq" && operator != "neq" { return FilterParam{}, fmt.Errorf("Unsupported operator %s for field %s. Only 'eq' and 'neq' are supported.", operator, field) } } else if contains(greaterSmallerFields, field) { if !validation.IsValidCompareGreaterSmallerOperator(operator) { return FilterParam{}, fmt.Errorf("Unsupported operator %s for field %s. Supported operators: eq, neq, gt, lt, gte, lte.", operator, field) } } else if contains(dateFields, field) { if !validation.IsValidCompareGreaterSmallerOperator(operator) { return FilterParam{}, fmt.Errorf("Unsupported operator %s for field %s. Supported operators: eq, neq, gt, lt, gte, lte.", operator, field) } if !validation.IsValidDate(value) { return FilterParam{}, fmt.Errorf("Invalid date format: %s. Expected: YYYY-MM-DD", value) } } else { return FilterParam{}, fmt.Errorf("Unsupported filter field: %s", field) } return FilterParam{Field: field, Operator: operator, Value: value}, nil }
I added PropertyFilterParams to the PropertyQueryParams struct:
type PropertyQueryParams struct { PaginationParams Filter PropertyFilterParams `query:"filters" doc:"Filter properties by various fields"` Sort PropertySortParams `query:"sorts" doc:"Sort properties by various fields"` }
This is how adding PropertyQueryParams to the route looks like (note that the Operation code itself, including the filter description, is under getAllPropertyOperation - I didn't paste the complete code for that, but hopefully you get the gist of it). If validation fails, it will throw a 422 response. I also added how we can loop through the filter values that got passed:
huma.Register(api, getAllPropertyOperation(schema, "get-properties", "/properties", []string{"Properties"}), func(ctx context.Context, input *struct { models.Headers models.PropertyQueryParams }) (*models.MultiplePropertyOutput, error) { for _, filter := range input.Filter.Items { fmt.Println(filter) } return mockMultiplePropertyResponse(), err }) }
I hope this helps someone. Let me know in the comments, if you found a better solution.
The above is the detailed content of Adding filter query parameters in Go Huma. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goisidealforbeginnersandsuitableforcloudandnetworkservicesduetoitssimplicity,efficiency,andconcurrencyfeatures.1)InstallGofromtheofficialwebsiteandverifywith'goversion'.2)Createandrunyourfirstprogramwith'gorunhello.go'.3)Exploreconcurrencyusinggorout

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.
