Promise.all() vs. Multiple await: When Do Timing Differences Matter?
Await Promise.all() vs. Multiple Await: Timing Differences
In JavaScript, asynchronous operations can be handled using Promise.all() or multiple await statements. While both methods ultimately serve the same purpose of waiting for multiple promises to settle, there are some subtle timing differences between them.
Scenario 1: Using Promise.all()
Promise.all() takes an array of promises and returns a single promise that resolves to an array of results once all the input promises have settled, regardless of whether they resolve or reject.
Example:
const data = await Promise.all([res(3000), res(2000), res(1000)])
In this example, the Promise.all() method delays the resolution of data until all three input promises have resolved.
Scenario 2: Using Multiple await Statements
In this scenario, multiple await statements are used to wait for each individual promise to settle:
const t1 = task1(); const t2 = task2(); const result1 = await t1; const result2 = await t2;
Here, result1 will be resolved as soon as task1() settles, and result2 will be resolved as soon as task2() settles.
Timing Comparison
The main timing difference between these two approaches is that Promise.all() delays the resolution of the final result until all input promises have settled. This can be advantageous in scenarios where it's important to wait for all tasks to complete before proceeding.
On the other hand, using multiple await statements allows for individual tasks to settle independently, potentially resulting in a faster overall completion time.
Example Illustration
Let's consider an example where delay functions are used to simulate asynchronous tasks:
Example #1 (Using Promise.all()):
const data = await Promise.all([res(3000), res(2000), res(1000)])
Example #2 (Using Multiple await Statements):
const t1 = task1(); const t2 = task2(); const t3 = task3(); const result1 = await t1; const result2 = await t2; const result3 = await t3;
In Example #1, the Promise.all() method would delay the resolution of data until all three tasks have completed, taking 3 seconds. In Example #2, since the tasks settle independently, result1 would be available after 1 second, result2 after 2 seconds, and result3 after 3 seconds.
The above is the detailed content of Promise.all() vs. Multiple await: When Do Timing Differences Matter?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.

JavaScript's application in the real world includes front-end and back-end development. 1) Display front-end applications by building a TODO list application, involving DOM operations and event processing. 2) Build RESTfulAPI through Node.js and Express to demonstrate back-end applications.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Both Python and JavaScript's choices in development environments are important. 1) Python's development environment includes PyCharm, JupyterNotebook and Anaconda, which are suitable for data science and rapid prototyping. 2) The development environment of JavaScript includes Node.js, VSCode and Webpack, which are suitable for front-end and back-end development. Choosing the right tools according to project needs can improve development efficiency and project success rate.

C and C play a vital role in the JavaScript engine, mainly used to implement interpreters and JIT compilers. 1) C is used to parse JavaScript source code and generate an abstract syntax tree. 2) C is responsible for generating and executing bytecode. 3) C implements the JIT compiler, optimizes and compiles hot-spot code at runtime, and significantly improves the execution efficiency of JavaScript.

JavaScript is widely used in websites, mobile applications, desktop applications and server-side programming. 1) In website development, JavaScript operates DOM together with HTML and CSS to achieve dynamic effects and supports frameworks such as jQuery and React. 2) Through ReactNative and Ionic, JavaScript is used to develop cross-platform mobile applications. 3) The Electron framework enables JavaScript to build desktop applications. 4) Node.js allows JavaScript to run on the server side and supports high concurrent requests.

Python is more suitable for data science and automation, while JavaScript is more suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 1. Python performs well in data science and machine learning, using libraries such as NumPy and Pandas for data processing and modeling. 2. Python is concise and efficient in automation and scripting. 3. JavaScript is indispensable in front-end development and is used to build dynamic web pages and single-page applications. 4. JavaScript plays a role in back-end development through Node.js and supports full-stack development.
